首页> 外文期刊>Nature >Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences
【24h】

Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences

机译:通过核蛋白编码序列的系统进化分析揭示节肢动物的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The remarkable antiquity, diversity and ecological significance of arthropods have inspired numerous attempts to resolve their deep phylogenetic history, but the results of two decades of intensive molecular phylogenetics have been mixed. The discovery that terrestrial insects (Hexapoda) are more closely related to aquatic Crustacea than to the terrestrial centipedes and millipedes (Myriapoda) was an early, if exceptional, success. More typically, analyses based on limited samples of taxa and genes have generated results that are inconsistent, weakly supported and highly sensitive to analytical conditions. Here we present strongly supported results from likelihood, Bayesian and parsimony analyses of over 41 kilobases of aligned DNA sequence from 62 single-copy nuclear protein-coding genes from 75 arthropod species. These species represent every major arthropod lineage, plus five species of tardigrades and onychophorans as outgroups. Our results strongly support Pancrustacea (Hexapoda plus Crustacea) but also strongly favour the traditional morphology-based Mandibulata (Myriapoda plus Pancrustacea) over the molecule-based Paradoxopoda (Myriapoda plus Chelicerata). In addition to Hexapoda, Pancrustacea includes three major extant lineages of 'crustaceans', each spanning a significant range of morphological disparity. These are Oligostraca (ostracods, mystacocarids, branchiurans and pentastomids), Veri-crustacea (malacostracans, thecostracans, copepods and branchio-pods) and Xenocarida (cephalocarids and remipedes). Finally, within Pancrustacea we identify Xenocarida as the long-sought sister group to the Hexapoda, a result confirming that 'crustaceans' are not mono-phyletic. These results provide a statistically well-supported phylogenetic framework for the largest animal phylum and represent a step towards ending the often-heated, century-long debate on arthropod relationships.%节肢动物在演化上的相互关系是个长期存rn在争议的问题。一项根据对来自75个物种(包rn括每个主要节肢动物分支的代表物种)的超过rn41,000个DNA碱基对所做分析的新的系统发rn生学研究,将有助于在这个问题上形成共识。rn该研究所获数据支持这样的观点:昆虫是陆生rn甲壳动物;甲壳动物是个多样化类群,至少rn包括三个截然不同的节肢动物类型;多足动物rn(“千足虫”和蜈蚣)是这一“泛甲壳动物”类群rn的亲缘关系最近者。
机译:节肢动物的显着的古代,多样性和生态学意义激发了许多尝试,以解决其深厚的系统发育史,但是二十年来密集的分子系统发育学的结果却是混杂的。发现陆生昆虫(六足纲)与水生甲壳动物的关系比与陆生cent和千足虫(Myriapoda)的关系更紧密,这是一个早期的成功(即使是例外)。更典型地,基于有限的分类单元和基因样本的分析所产生的结果不一致,支持不力且对分析条件高度敏感。在这里,我们从来自75个节肢动物物种的62个单拷贝核蛋白编码基因的41个碱基对的比对DNA序列的似然,贝叶斯和简约分析中提供了有力的支持结果。这些物种代表每个主要的节肢动物世系,外加五种节肢动物和甲虫。我们的结果有力地支持了甲壳纲(六足纲和甲壳纲),但也强烈支持了传统的基于形态学的下颌纲(Myriapoda + Pancrustacea),而不是基于分子的寄生虫​​纲(Myriapoda + Chelicerata)。除六足纲动物外,甲壳纲还包括三个主要现存的“甲壳纲”谱系,每个谱系跨越很大范围的形态差异。它们是Oligostraca(兽脚纲动物,Mystacocarids,branchiurans和pentastomids),Veri-甲壳纲动物(malacostracans,costracans,co足类和branchio-pods)和Xenocarida(头足纲和复足纲)。最后,在Pancrustacea中,我们将Xenocarida鉴定为Hexapoda的长期寻求的姐妹群体,这一结果证实了“甲壳类”并非单系的。这些结果为最大的动物门提供了统计上得到充分支持的系统发育框架,并代表了朝着结束对节肢动物关系的热烈讨论长达一个世纪之路迈出的一步。问题。根据根据来自75个物种(包rn括每个主要节肢动物分支的代表种类)的超过rn41,000个DNA序列对构成分析的新的系统发rn生学研究,将有助该研究所获数据支持这样的观点:昆虫是陆生rn甲壳动物;甲壳动物是个类别类,至少rn包括三个截然不同的节肢动物类型;多足动物rn (“千足虫”和蜈蚣)是这一“泛甲壳动物”类群rn的亲缘关系最近者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |2010年第25期|1079-1083v|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA;

    Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA;

    Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA;

    Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA;

    Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;

    Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA;

    Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA;

    Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号