首页> 外文期刊>Natural language & linguistic theory >Similatives and the argument structure of verbs
【24h】

Similatives and the argument structure of verbs

机译:类比和动词的论证结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I begin with the observation in Haspelmath and Buchholz (1998) that languages tend to use the same morpheme to mark the standard of comparison across equation constructions. In English, it is the morpheme as, in similatives like John danced as Sue {did) and equatives like John is as tall as Sue (is). The first goal of this paper is to provide an analysis of as that accounts for its distribution across these constructions. The second goal of this paper is to provide an account of Haspelmath and Buccholz's second observation, which is that while languages can form equatives with parameter markers (PMs; the first as in John is as tall as Sue (is)), languages generally do not form similatives with parameter markers. I suggest that equation constructions are a test for lexicalized argumenthood, i.e. that the equation of a non-lexicalized argument prohibits the presence of a PM, and, for English, vice-versa. This leads to the conclusion that, contrary to recent claims (Pifion 2008; Bochnak 2013), verbs, unlike adjectives, generally do not lexicalize degree arguments.
机译:我首先从Haspelmath和Buchholz(1998)的观察开始,即语言倾向于使用相同的词素来标记等式构造中的比较标准。在英语中,它是语素,在像约翰这样的类似词中跳舞成苏(did),在像约翰这样的等式中,它与苏(is)一样高。本文的首要目标是提供一个分析,从而解释其在这些构造中的分布。本文的第二个目标是说明Haspelmath和Buccholz的第二个观察结果,即语言可以用参数标记形成等价物(PMs; John中的第一个与Sue(is)一样高),语言通常可以不能使用参数标记形成模拟。我建议方程式构造是对词汇化论点的一种检验,即非词汇化论点的方程式禁止存在PM,对于英语而言,反之亦然。由此得出的结论是,与最近的主张相反(Pifion 2008; Bochnak 2013),动词与形容词不同,通常不对程度自变量进行词汇化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号