...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural language & linguistic theory >A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality The view from Greek and Italian
【24h】

A unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality The view from Greek and Italian

机译:对未来作为认知形态的统一分析希腊和意大利的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We offer an analysis of the Greek and Italian future morphemes as epistemic modal operators. The main empirical motivation comes from the fact that future morphemes have systematic purely epistemic readings-not only in Greek and Italian, but also in Dutch, German, and English will. The existence of epistemic readings suggests that the future expressions quantify over epistemic, not metaphysical alternatives. We provide a unified analysis for epistemic and predictive readings as epistemic necessity, and the shift between the two is determined compositionally by the lower tense. Our account thus acknowledges a systematic interaction between modality and tense-but the future itself is a pure modal, not a mixed temporal/modal operator. We show that the modal base of the future is nonveridical, i.e. it includes p and Anotsignp worlds, parallel to epistemic modals such as must, and present arguments that future morphemes are a category that stands in between epistemic modals and predicates of personal taste. We identify, finally, a subclass of epistemic futures which are ratificational, and argue that will is a member of this class.
机译:我们提供对希腊和意大利未来语素作为认知模态运算符的分析。主要的经验动机来自这样一个事实,即将来的语素具有系统的纯粹的认知读法-不仅在希腊语和意大利语中,而且在荷兰语,德语和英语中也是如此。认知读物的存在表明,未来的表达将量化于认知而不是形而上学的选择。我们根据认知的必要性对认知和预测性阅读提供统一的分析,二者之间的转换由较低的时态组成。因此,我们的论述承认模态与时态之间存在系统的相互作用,但未来本身就是纯模态,而不是时间/模态混合运算符。我们证明了未来的情态基础是非标准的,即它包括p和Anotsignp世界,与诸如must之类的认知情态平行,并提出了未来的词素属于介于认知情态和个人品味谓词之间的范畴的论点。最后,我们确定了认可的认知期货的子类别,并认为意志是该类别的成员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号