首页> 外文期刊>Natural language & linguistic theory >On the nature of differential object marking Insights from Palauan
【24h】

On the nature of differential object marking Insights from Palauan

机译:关于差异对象标记的性质帕劳见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Palauan (Austronesian) displays a pattern of differential object marking that is limited to the imperfective aspect. In the imperfective, human and/or specific objects are overtly marked. In the perfective aspect, no objects are overtly marked. Conversely, objects in the perfective aspect are cross-referenced by agreement morphology on the verb, while objects in the imperfective aspect never are. I argue that this pattern of aspect-conditioned differential object marking provides support for the position that the phenomenon is best analyzed as arising due to the result of satisfying exceptional licensing requirements enforced by a subset of noun phrases (Kalin 2014).
机译:uan琉(南洋语)显示了一种差异对象标记的模式,该模式仅限于不完美的方面。在不完美的情况下,人类和/或特定的物体被明显地标记。在完美方面,没有任何对象被明显标记。相反,动词上的达成形态学则对完全性方面的对象进行交叉引用,而不完全性方面中的对象则从来没有。我认为,这种以方面为条件的差异对象标记的模式为以下观点提供了支持:最好地分析这种现象,这是由于满足由名词短语的子集强制执行的特殊许可要求的结果(Kalin 2014)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号