首页> 外文期刊>Music and Letters >Musicology and Critical Theory: The Case of Wagner, Adorno, and Horkheimer
【24h】

Musicology and Critical Theory: The Case of Wagner, Adorno, and Horkheimer

机译:音乐学和批判理论:瓦格纳,阿多诺和霍克海默的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adorno’s Versuch über Wagner (1938/1952) is unquestionably a significant musicological work, yet the discipline has sought mostly to neutralize, even while registering, its impact. The essential and acknowledged influence of Max Horkheimer’s study of bourgeois anthropological ideology upon Adorno’s monograph is outlined in order to construct a context for its understanding and use within musicology. More broadly, the question is raised whether this collision of ideas originating with the ‘Frankfurt School’ offers a workable model for reading, into music, a coded reflection of sociological meaning. To conclude, a suggestion is put forward as to how the Versuch might be used as a basis for ongoing research: will history judge Wagner’s achievement to be the source of so-called ‘new music’, or merely an extravagant symptom of the decline of the old?
机译:Adorno的VersuchüberWagner(1938/1952)无疑是一项重要的音乐学著作,但该学科一直在寻求最大程度地抵消其影响,即使在进行唱片登记时也是如此。概述了马克斯·霍克海默(Max Horkheimer)对资产阶级人类学意识形态的研究对阿多诺(Adorno)专论的重要和公认的影响,目的是构建其在音乐学中的理解和运用的背景。从更广泛的意义上来说,人们提出的问题是,源自“法兰克福学派”的思想冲突是否提供了一种可行的模式,可以将社会学意义的编码反映读入音乐。总而言之,提出了一个建议,关于如何将Versuch用作正在进行的研究的基础:历史会否判断Wagner的成就是所谓的“新音乐”的源头,还是仅仅是音乐衰落的一种奢侈症状?老人?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号