首页> 外文期刊>Monthly Weather Review >A New Measure of Ensemble Performance: Perturbation versus Error Correlation Analysis (PECA)
【24h】

A New Measure of Ensemble Performance: Perturbation versus Error Correlation Analysis (PECA)

机译:集成性能的一种新度量:摄动与误差相关分析(PECA)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most existing ensemble forecast verification statistics are influenced by the quality of not only the ensemble generation scheme, but also the forecast model and the analysis scheme. In this study, a new tool called perturbation versus error correlation analysis (PECA) is introduced that lessens the influence of the initial errors that affect the quality of the analysis. PECA evaluates the ensemble perturbations, instead of the forecasts themselves, by measuring their ability to explain forecast error variance. As such, PECA offers a more appropriate tool for the comparison of ensembles generated by using different analysis schemes. Ensemble perturbations from both the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) were evaluated and found to perform similarly. The error variance explained by either ensemble increases with the number of members and the lead time. The dynamically conditioned NCEP and ECMWF perturbations outperform both randomly chosen perturbations and differences between lagged forecasts [used in the "NMC" (for National Meteorological Center, the former name of NCEP) method for defining forecast error covariance matrices]. Therefore ensemble forecasts potentially could be used to construct flow-dependent short-range forecast error covariance matrices for use in data assimilation schemes. It is well understood that in a perfectly reliable ensemble the spread of ensemble members around the ensemble mean forecast equals the root-mean-square (rms) error of the mean. Adequate rms spread, however, does not guarantee sufficient variability among the ensemble forecast patterns. A comparison between PECA values and pattern anomaly correlation (PAC) values among the ensemble members reveals that the perturbations in the NCEP ensemble exhibit too much similarity, especially on the smaller scales. Hence a regional orthogonalization of the perturbations may improve ensemble performance.
机译:大多数现有的集成预测验证统计数据不仅受集成生成方案的质量影响,还受预测模型和分析方案的质量影响。在这项研究中,引入了一种名为“摄动与误差相关分析”(PECA)的新工具,该工具可减轻影响分析质量的初始误差的影响。 PECA通过测量其解释预测误差方差的能力来评估整体扰动,而不是预测本身。因此,PECA为比较使用不同分析方案生成的乐团提供了更合适的工具。评估了来自国家环境预测中心(NCEP)和欧洲中距离天气预报中心(ECMWF)的整体扰动,并发现它们的表现类似。任一个合集解释的误差方差都随着成员数量和提前期而增加。动态条件化的NCEP和ECMWF摄动优于随机选择的摄动和滞后预报之间的差异(用于“ NMC”(对于国家气象中心,NCEP的前称),用于定义预报误差协方差矩阵)。因此,集成预测可能会被用于构建与流量相关的短程预测误差协方差矩阵,以用于数据同化方案。众所周知,在一个完全可靠的集合中,集合成员在集合均值预测周围的分布等于均方根(rms)误差。但是,均方根值的适当扩展不能保证整体预测模式之间有足够的可变性。集合成员之间的PECA值和模式异常相关性(PAC)值之间的比较表明,NCEP集合中的扰动表现出太多的相似性,尤其是在较小的尺度上。因此,扰动的区域正交化可以提高整体性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号