首页> 外文期刊>Modern & Contemporary France >The French Campaign for Improved Road Safety: State Power, Public Policy, and Regimes of Justification
【24h】

The French Campaign for Improved Road Safety: State Power, Public Policy, and Regimes of Justification

机译:法国提高道路安全运动:国家权力,公共政策和辩护制度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In reaction against Bourdieu's state-centered analysis of power, theorists associated with the 'Groupe de sociologie morale' argue that non-state actors exercise considerable agency. In so doing, these actors draw upon 'regimes of justification' to formulate and defend moral schemes of action. While a necessary corrective to a Bourdieusian view of the world in which habitus and institutional fields of power leave relatively little room for creative agency, this position nonetheless leaves unanswered questions pertaining to the role of the state and its relation to these regimes of justification. The recent French campaign for road safety provides an opportune instance in which to observe how states can and do draw on regimes of justification to legitimate public policies. Here I argue that the French government used two regimes, namely those based on civic equality and solidarity and on industrial efficiency, to legitimate new measures that cut across longstanding cultural patterns. In this process, the supposedly dirigiste French state actively sought civil society partners to educate French drivers and to convince them to accept, however grudgingly, the new policies. This case example thus suggests a middle path between the Bourdieusian view of the state as the ultimate field of power and the emphasis on individual agency of the approach associated with the 'Groupe de sociologie morale'.
机译:为了回应布迪厄对国家权力的分析,与“社会士气集团”相关的理论家认为,非国家行为者行使着相当大的代理权。在这种情况下,这些行为者利用“辩护制度”来制定和捍卫道德行动计划。尽管这是对布尔迪厄斯主义世界观的必要修正,在这种世界中,惯性和权力机构领域几乎没有创造力,因此,这一立场仍未解决有关国家角色及其与这些辩护制度的关系的问题。法国最近的道路安全运动提供了一个合适的实例,在其中可以观察到各国如何能够,也确实可以利用合法的公共政策辩护制度。在这里,我认为法国政府采用了两种制度,即基于公民平等和团结以及基于工业效率的制度,以合法化跨越长期文化模式的新措施。在这个过程中,据称是原住民的法国国家积极寻求民间社会合作伙伴对法国驾驶员进行教育,并说服他们接受新政策,无论多么勉强。因此,这个案例表明,在布迪厄斯将国家视为最终权力领域的观点与强调与“社会道德团体”相关的方法的个体代理之间的中间路径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号