首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Which party is sounder on the public finances?
【24h】

Which party is sounder on the public finances?

机译:哪个方面对公共财政影响更大?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With its usual impeccable timing, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has issued its analysis of how the three main political parties intend balancing the books should they be in government next May. And don't think the politicians can bamboozle the IFS. As anyone who has attended The MJ Future Forum in March knows, IFS director Paul Johnson's speciality is to take the Budget apart. He was at it again this week casting scepticism over Ed Balls' Labour conference pledge to show how tough he would be on public spending by freezing child benefit. The coalition's fiscal mandate is that the cyclically-adjusted current budget should be in balance or surplus by 2019, which it can meet, assuming the extra spending cuts outlined post-2015 go ahead. Conservative policy now is to aim for a budget surplus, but this implies a further cut of £37.6bn on top of the £8.7bn earmarked for 2015/16.
机译:在通常情况下无懈可击的时间安排下,财政研究所发表了对三个主要政党打算在明年五月就任时如何平衡账目的分析。而且不要以为政治家可以bamboo视IFS。众所周知,3月参加了MJ未来论坛的人都知道,IFS主管保罗·约翰逊(Paul Johnson)的专长是将预算案分开。他本周再次对埃德·鲍尔斯(Ed Balls)的劳工大会誓言表示怀疑,以表明他将通过冻结儿童福利而在公共支出上有多艰难。联盟的财政授权是,假设2015年后计划的额外支出削减计划得以实施,那么经过周期性调整的当前预算应在2019年前保持平衡或盈余。保守政策目前的目标是实现预算盈余,但这意味着在2015/16财年预算的87亿英镑基础上再削减376亿英镑。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2014年第25期|10-10|共1页
  • 作者

    Michael Burton;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号