首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >'Peer reviews are not perfect,' says Sparks
【24h】

'Peer reviews are not perfect,' says Sparks

机译:斯帕克斯说:“同行评议并不完美”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The chair of the Local Government Association (LGA) has admitted weaknesses with the sector-led improvement approach despite his organisation having hailed it as a 'success story'. Quizzed about the effectiveness of the LGA's peer challenge process at the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives (SOLACE) summit in Liverpool, David Sparks conceded he did not have an 'absolute answer'. Cllr Sparks was responding to Swale BC chief executive Abdool Kara, who queried whether the LGA sometimes 'pulled its punches' in peer reviews. Mr Kara said he thought peer challenges were sometimes not carried out very well, were not resourced enough and did not go deep enough, adding: 'I get worried when the LGA says that the process can provide assurance.'
机译:地方政府协会(LGA)主席承认,该部门领导的改进方法存在缺陷,尽管他的组织将其称为“成功故事”。在利物浦地方当局行政总裁协会(SOLACE)峰会上,LGA同行挑战程序的有效性受到质疑,David Sparks承认他没有“绝对答案”。 Cllr Sparks回应了Swale BC首席执行官Abdool Kara,后者询问LGA有时是否在同行评议中“拉拳”。卡拉先生说,他认为同伴挑战有时不能很好地进行,没有足够的资源并且不够深入,他补充说:“当LGA表示该过程可以提供保证时,我感到担心。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2014年第23期|3-3|共1页
  • 作者

    Dan Peters;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号