首页> 外文期刊>MIS quarterly >A Matter of Life and Death: Exploring Conceptualizations of Sociomateriality in the Context of Critical Care
【24h】

A Matter of Life and Death: Exploring Conceptualizations of Sociomateriality in the Context of Critical Care

机译:生与死的事情:在重症监护下探索社会物质的概念化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sociomateriality has been attracting growing attention in the Organization Studies and Information Systems literatures since 2007, with more than 140 journal articles now referring to the concept. Over 80 percent of these articles have been published since January 2011 and almost all cite the work of Orlikowski (2007, 2010; Orlikowski and Scott 2008) as the source of the concept. Only a few, however, address all of the notions that Orlikowski suggests are entailed in sociomateriality, namely materiality, inseparability, relationality, perform-ativity, and practices, with many employing the concept quite selectively. The contribution of sociomateriality to these literatures is, therefore, still unclear. Drawing on evidence from an ongoing study of the adoption of a computer-based clinical information system in a hospital critical care unit, this paper explores whether the notions, individually and collectively, offer a distinctive and coherent account of the relationship between the social and the material that may be useful in Information Systems research. It is argued that if sociomateriality is to be more than simply a label for research employing a number of loosely related existing theoretical approaches, then studies employing the concept need to pay greater attention to the notions entailed in it and to differences in their interpretation.
机译:自2007年以来,社会物质性一直在组织研究和信息系统文献中引起越来越多的关注,现在有140余篇期刊文章提到了这一概念。自2011年1月以来,这些文章中有80%以上已经发表,几乎所有文章都引用了Orlikowski的工作(2007年,2010年; Orlikowski和Scott 2008年)作为这一概念的来源。然而,只有少数人解决了奥尔里科夫斯基提出的所有与社会物质有关的概念,即物质性,不可分割性,关系性,表现积极性和实践性,其中许多都相当有选择性地采用了这一概念。因此,社会重要性对这些文献的贡献仍然不清楚。根据正在进行的关于医院重症监护室采用基于计算机的临床信息系统研究的证据,本文探讨了这些概念是否在个体和集体方面提供了独特的,连贯的说明社会与社会之间关系的说明。在信息系统研究中可能有用的材料。有人认为,如果要使社会物质性不仅仅是使用许多松散相关的现有理论方法进行研究的标签,那么采用该概念的研究就需要更多地关注其中所包含的概念及其解释上的差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《MIS quarterly》 |2014年第3期|895-925|共31页
  • 作者

    Matthew Jones;

  • 作者单位

    Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB 2 1AG UNITED KINGDOM;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Sociomateriality; practice; empirical; adoption; interpretive;

    机译:社会重要性;实践;经验;采用;解释性的;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号