...
首页> 外文期刊>Minds and Machines >Accountability and Control Over Autonomous Weapon Systems: A Framework for Comprehensive Human Oversight
【24h】

Accountability and Control Over Autonomous Weapon Systems: A Framework for Comprehensive Human Oversight

机译:对自主武器系统的问责制和控制:综合人类监督框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accountability and responsibility are key concepts in the academic and societal debate on Autonomous Weapon Systems, but these notions are often used as high-level overarching constructs and are not operationalised to be useful in practice. "Meaningful Human Control" is often mentioned as a requirement for the deployment of Autonomous Weapon Systems, but a common definition of what this notion means in practice, and a clear understanding of its relation with responsibility and accountability is also lacking. In this paper, we present a definition of these concepts and describe the relations between accountability, responsibility, control and oversight in order to show how these notions are distinct but also connected. We focus on accountability as a particular form of responsibility-the obligation to explain one's action to a forum-and we present three ways in which the introduction of Autonomous Weapon Systems may create "accountability gaps". We propose a Framework for Comprehensive Human Oversight based on an engineering, socio-technical and governance perspective on control. Our main claim is that combining the control mechanisms at technical, socio-technical and governance levels will lead to comprehensive human oversight over Autonomous Weapon Systems which may ensure solid controllability and accountability for the behaviour of Autonomous Weapon Systems. Finally, we give an overview of the military control instruments that are currently used in the Netherlands and show the applicability of the comprehensive human oversight Framework to Autonomous Weapon Systems. Our analysis reveals two main gaps in the current control mechanisms as applied to Autonomous Weapon Systems. We have identified three first options as future work for the design of a control mechanism, one in the technological layer, one in the socio-technical layer and one the governance layer, in order to achieve comprehensive human oversight and ensure accountability over Autonomous Weapon Systems.
机译:问责制和责任是自主武器系统的学术和社会辩论中的关键概念,但这些概念通常被用作高级总体构建体,并且在实践中不可用于有用。通常被提到“有意义的人类控制”作为部署自主武器系统的要求,而是对这种概念在实践中意味着什么的共同定义,并清楚地了解其与责任和问责制的关系也是缺乏。在本文中,我们展示了这些概念的定义,并描述了问责制,责任,控制和监督之间的关系,以便展示这些概念是如何截然不同的。我们将问责制关注为特定形式的责任 - 向论坛解释一个人行动的义务 - 我们提出了三种方式,其中引入自主武器系统可能会创造“问责差距”。我们为基于工程,社会技术和治理视角来提出了一个综合人类监督的框架。我们的主要索赔是,将控制机制与技术,社会技术和治理水平相结合,将导致对自主武器系统的全面的人类监督,这可能确保自主武器系统行为的稳定可控性和责任。最后,我们概述目前在荷兰使用的军事控制仪器,并展示了综合人类监督框架对自主武器系统的适用性。我们的分析显示了应用于自主武器系统的当前控制机制中的两个主要差距。我们已经确定了三个第一个选择作为未来的工作,以便设计控制机制,一个在技术层中,一个在社会技术层和一个治理层中,为了实现全面的人类监督,确保对自主武器系统的责任。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号