首页> 外文期刊>Minds and Machines >Dedre Gentner and Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds): Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003, ISBN 0-262-57163-3, x + 528 pp
【24h】

Dedre Gentner and Susan Goldin-Meadow (eds): Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003, ISBN 0-262-57163-3, x + 528 pp

机译:Dedre Gentner和Susan Goldin-Meadow(eds):心灵语言:语言和思想研究的进展。马萨诸塞州剑桥市:麻省理工学院出版社,2003年,ISBN 0-262-57163-3,x + 528页

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite 'scientific' developments and experimental research in the fields of linguistic and cognitive sciences, the relationship between language, thought and cognition is far from settled. On the contrary, these inquiries seem to make the issue ever more elusive. Empirical investigations are not in themselves decisive, since they are founded on assumptions and specific modes of posing questions, which go deep into diverse philosophical musings. This is not to deny the role of preconceptions in any serious scientific work, but the results can sometimes be just as conclusive as the reckonings of Tweedledum-Tweedledee in "If it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be: but as it isn't, it ain't" (Lewis Carrol's Through the Looking Glass). This 'uncertainty' in experimental physics, way back in 1897, would have almost denied us the discovery of electrons, had not J. J. Thomson's sensibilities superseded the positivistic outlook of his contemporary Walter Kaufmann (Weinberg, 1992). But then, "If science is the constellation of facts, theories, and methods ..., then scientists are the [wo]men who, successfully or not, have striven to contribute one or another element to that particular constellation. Scientific development becomes the piecemeal process by which these items have been added, singly and in combination, to the ever growing stockpile that constitutes scientific technique and knowledge" (Kuhn, 1996, pp. 1-2). The success of the present collection of articles by cognitive scientists and linguists lies in the reconfirmation of these facts. Reposing one of the original questions of the discipline—the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis that contemplates the possible influence of language on thought—the book makes latest approaches and research in cognitive linguistics undergo test by fire.
机译:尽管在语言学和认知科学领域进行了“科学”发展和实验研究,但是语言,思想和认知之间的关系还远未解决。相反,这些查询似乎使问题变得更加难以捉摸。实证研究本身并不是决定性的,因为它们建立在提出问题的假设和特定模式的基础上,这些假设和问题的模式深入到各种哲学思考中。这并不是要否认先入为主的观念在任何严肃的科学工作中的作用,但结果有时可以与特威德勒姆·特威德利(Tweedledum-Tweedledee)在“如果是这样,也许是这样;如果是这样,那么它将是:但事实并非如此”(刘易斯·卡罗尔的《透过镜》)。这种实验物理学的“不确定性”可以追溯到1897年,如果没有J. J. Thomson的敏锐性取代了他当代的Walter Kaufmann的实证主义观点(Weinberg,1992年),我们几乎会否认我们发现了电子。但是,然后,“如果科学是事实,理论和方法的星座……,那么科学家就是成功或不成功地为那个特定星座贡献一个或另一个要素的妇女。科学发展成为将这些项目单独或组合添加到构成科学技术和知识的不断增长的储存中的零碎过程”(库恩,1996年,第1-2页)。认知科学家和语言学家目前所收集文章的成功在于对这些事实的重新确认。该书解决了该学科的原始问题之一,即考虑语言可能对思想产生影响的Sapir-Whorf假说,该书使认知语言学的最新方法和研究受到了极大的考验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号