首页> 外文期刊>Mind & society >Judging the quality of (fake) news on the internet
【24h】

Judging the quality of (fake) news on the internet

机译:判断互联网上的(假)新闻的质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The only reliable remedy against anxiety is information, and reliable information and news are of crucial value in times of crises, such as COVID-19. Contemporary social media offers almost everyone a platform to publish one’s own thoughts, opinions, political statements and others, some of which may gain significant interest of others and thereby become so called “influencers”. This role has in the past been held by news agencies primarily, but this role is increasingly adopted also by private people and among them, also some who do not necessarily adhere the high standards of good journalism or scientific ethics. These give rise to fake news, spreading as unconfirmed rumors and possibly causing dramatic impacts to a society. With information available almost everywhere in the internet today, the distinction between good and bad sources has become a challenge, and highly difficult task. Even more intricate is the question of verifying information against multiple independent sources. If many people say something, does this make it true or any more plausible? Do we need to trust information in lack of better information? Is it possible to judge information and make our own opinion about its validity, quality, relevance or usefulness for our own business? This article shall provide pointers towards answers to the above questions. We discuss some technical means of judging the quality of information and what anyone, even without much technical background can do to avoid falling victim to fake information and fake news.
机译:唯一可靠的焦虑补救措施是信息,可靠的信息和新闻在危机时期的价值是关键的价值,例如Covid-19。当代社交媒体提供几乎所有人的平台,以发布自己的想法,意见,政治声明和其他平台,其中一些可能会增加他人的重大兴趣,从而成为所谓的“影响者”。这一角色在过去被新闻机构举办了新闻机构,但这种作用也越来越受到私人人民以及其中一些人,也是一些不一定坚持高标准的良好新闻或科学伦理。这些引起假新闻,作为未经证实的谣言传播并可能对社会产生巨大影响。随着互联网上几乎到处提供的信息,良好和坏消息来源的区别已成为挑战,并且非常艰巨的任务。更复杂的是验证对多个独立来源的信息的问题。如果有很多人说些什么,这是否使它成为真实或更合理的?我们是否需要信任缺乏更好信息的信息?是否有可能判断信息,并对我们自己的业务的有效性,质量,相关性或有用性进行审判,并使我们的意见?本文应向上述问题的答案提供指针。我们讨论了判断信息质量和任何人的技术手段,即使没有太多的技术背景,也可以避免将受害者降落到假信息和假新闻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号