首页> 外文期刊>Mind & society >Rationality in a fatalistic world: explaining revolutionary apathy in pre-Soviet peasants
【24h】

Rationality in a fatalistic world: explaining revolutionary apathy in pre-Soviet peasants

机译:致命世界中的理性:在苏联普雷斯农民解释革命性的冷漠

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper studies the attempts (and failure) of Russian revolutionaries to mobilize the peasantry in the decade leading to the Soviet revolution of 1917. Peasants, who had been emancipated from serfdom only four decades earlier, in 1861, were still largely propertyless and poor. This would, at first glance, make them a ripe target for revolutionary activity. But peasants were largely refractory. We explain this lack of revolutionary spirit through two models. First, despite their lack of education and political awareness, the peasants were rational in their refusal to participate in revolutionary activity; they engaged in a cost-benefit calculus which pushed them away from revolt and political organization. Second, based on the Wildavsky-Thomp-son cultural types, Russian peasants were largely fatalist: they believed they had no influence on the world, so it was not worth attempting to change it. This paper sheds light on some aspects of the Russian revolution, but also encourages further research in history and economic sociology on the interaction between culture and incentives.
机译:本文研究了俄罗斯革命者的企图(和失败),以便在导致1917年苏联革命的十年中调动农民的革命性。在1861年仍然在Serfdom仅从Serfdom解放出来的农民仍然基本上是故障和穷人。这乍一看,这将使它们成为革命活动的成熟目标。但农民在很大程度上是难以忍受的。我们通过两种模型解释了这种缺乏革命精神。首先,尽管他们缺乏教育和政治意识,但农民在拒绝参与革命活动时具有理性;他们从事一种成本效益的微积分,将它们从叛乱和政治组织推开。其次,基于Wildavsky-Thomp-Son文化类型,俄罗斯农民在很大程度上是致命主义者:他们认为他们对世界没有影响,因此不值得改变它。本文在俄罗斯革命的某些方面阐明了光线,而且还鼓励进一步研究历史和经济社会学的研究,就培养和激励措施之间的互动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号