首页> 外文期刊>Mind & society >Inconsistency is not pathological: a pragmatic perspective
【24h】

Inconsistency is not pathological: a pragmatic perspective

机译:不一致不是病态的:务实的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Both behavioral and standard neoclassical economists place a heavy emphasis on the consistency of preferences. In particular, transitive preferences are considered a desideratum. This paper attempts to show that consistency at the level of individual choice may be pragmatically irrelevant. Consistently following an environmentally adapted rule can result in intransitive preferences without negative consequences for individual or social goals. I give three examples of this. Social scientists should look at intransitivity of choices as a challenge to offer better explanations rather than as a normative defect.
机译:行为经济学家和标准新古典经济学家都非常重视偏好的一致性。尤其是,传递性偏好被视为希望的。本文试图表明,在个人选择水平上的一致性可能在实用上是无关紧要的。始终遵循符合环境要求的规则可能会导致不偏不倚的偏好,而对个人或社会目标没有负面影响。我举三个例子。社会科学家应将选择的不及物性视为提供更好解释的挑战,而不是规范上的缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号