首页> 外文期刊>Microform & digitization review >The Post-Truth Archive: Considerations for Archiving Context in Fake News Repositories
【24h】

The Post-Truth Archive: Considerations for Archiving Context in Fake News Repositories

机译:真相后档案:假新闻存储库中归档上下文的注意事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our current media environment is in a state of post-truth disruption: fake news is rampant, trusted media sources are viewed as partisan and suspect, and emotional appeal and personal belief hold more influence than objective facts. While many information professions are focused on combatting fake news through media literacy education, policy development, and advancements in search and social media technology, the archival profession has a slightly different task: evaluating how fake news can be preserved. The proliferation of fake news marks a significant cultural shift in information, politics, and identity, and is a valuable retrospective on how we consume and share media and assess its collective impact on society. But archiving fake news is a complex endeavor, particularly when it comes to ensuring that the archive includes enough context to help future researchers interpret the information. This article briefly explores some of the ways archivists may need to rethink traditional archival practices when developing repositories for fake news in their archives.
机译:当前,我们的媒体环境处于后真相的破坏状态:虚假新闻猖,,可信赖的媒体来源被视为游击党和嫌疑人,情感诉求和个人信念比客观事实更具影响力。尽管许多信息专业致力于通过媒体素养教育,政策制定以及搜索和社交媒体技术的进步来打击假新闻,但档案专业的任务却略有不同:评估如何保存假新闻。假新闻的泛滥标志着信息,政治和身份的重大文化转变,并且是对我们如何消费和分享媒体以及评估其对社会的集体影响的宝贵回顾。但是存档假新闻是一项复杂的工作,尤其是在确保存档包含足够的上下文以帮助未来的研究人员解释信息时。本文简要探讨了归档员在开发档案中的假新闻存储库时可能需要重新考虑传统归档做法的一些方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号