首页> 外文期刊>Mental Health, Religion & Culture >The relationship between spiritual experiences, transpersonal trust, social support, and sense of coherence and mental distress—a comparison of spiritually practising and non-practising samples
【24h】

The relationship between spiritual experiences, transpersonal trust, social support, and sense of coherence and mental distress—a comparison of spiritually practising and non-practising samples

机译:精神体验,超个人信任,社会支持以及连贯感和精神困扰之间的关系-精神实践和非实践样本的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared the pathways from exceptional experiences (measured with the Exceptional Experiences Questionnaire, EEQ), transpersonal trust (TPV), social support (F-SoZu) and sense of coherence (SOC) scales towards mental distress within a spiritually practising (SP) and a non-practising sample (NSP), using structural equation modelling. We found a high amount of variance explained for SOC (SP: R2 = 0.50; NSP: R2 = 0.61), a moderate amount for F-SoZU (SP: R2 = 0.17; NSP: R2 = 0.20) and for TPV a very small amount only in the SP sample (SP: R2 = 0.04; NSP: R2 = 0.00). In contrast, for the EEQ, which grasps positive and negative spiritual, psychopathological, and visionary dream experiences, a strong relationship was found for the NSP sample (R2 = 0.53) but only a moderate relationship for the SP sample (R2 = 0.28). Further analysis revealed that the path coefficients from positive, negative spiritual, and psychopathological experiences to distress were significantly lower in the SP sample. Thus, as regular spiritual practice seems to alter the pathways to distress derived from positive and negative spiritual and psychopathological experiences, unidimensional questionnaires only grasping positive spiritual experiences seem to be inappropriate for explaining the intrapersonal mechanisms associated with regular spiritual practice. [The] unseen region in question is not merely ideal, for it produces effects in this world. When we commune with it, work is actually done upon our finite personality, for we are turned into new men, and consequences in the way of conduct follow in the natural world upon our regenerative charge. But that which produces effects within another reality must be termed a reality itself, so I feel as if we had no philosophical excuse for calling the unseen or mystical world unreal. (James, 1904, p. 516)
机译:我们比较了从异常经历(通过异常经历问卷调查,EEQ衡量),超人信任(TPV),社会支持(F-SoZu)和连贯感(SOC)量表到精神实践(SP)内的精神困扰的途径。使用结构方程模型的非实践样本(NSP)。我们发现,SOC的方差很大(SP:R 2 = 0.50; NSP:R 2 = 0.61),F-SoZU的方差很小(SP: R 2 = 0.17; NSP:R 2 = 0.20),而对于TPV,仅在SP样品中非常少(SP:R 2 = 0.04; NSP:R 2 = 0.00)。相反,对于掌握正面和负面的精神,心理病理学和有远见的梦境经历的EEQ,发现NSP样本之间存在很强的关系(R 2 = 0.53),而对于NSP样本则只有中等程度的关系。 SP样本(R 2 = 0.28)。进一步的分析表明,在SP样本中,从积极,消极的精神和心理病理经历到困扰的路径系数显着较低。因此,由于常规的精神实践似乎改变了从积极和消极的精神和心理病理经历中产生的困扰的途径,因此仅掌握积极的精神经历的一维问卷似乎不适用于解释与常规精神实践相关的人际关系机制。所讨论的[看不见的地区]不仅仅是理想的,因为它在这个世界上产生了影响。当我们与之交流时,实际上是在有限的人格上完成工作,因为我们变成了新人,自然行为的后果在我们的再生冲动下随之而来。但是在另一个现实中产生影响的事物必须被称为一个现实本身,因此我觉得我们似乎没有哲学上的借口来将看不见的或神秘的世界称为不现实。 (詹姆斯,1904年,第516页)

著录项

  • 来源
    《Mental Health, Religion & Culture》 |2009年第1期|1-23|共23页
  • 作者单位

    Generation Research Program, Human Science Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany|Brain, Mind and Healing Program, Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA, USA;

    Brain, Mind and Healing Program, Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA, USA|The University of Northampton, School of Social Sciences, Northampton, UK;

    Pdagogische Hochschule Freiburg, Institut fr Psychologie, Freiburg, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号