首页> 外文期刊>Medical Microbiology and Immunology >Hepatitis B virus genotype E surface antigen detection with different immunoassays and diagnostic impact of mutations in the preS/S gene
【24h】

Hepatitis B virus genotype E surface antigen detection with different immunoassays and diagnostic impact of mutations in the preS/S gene

机译:乙肝病毒E基因型表面抗原检测的不同免疫检测方法和preS / S基因突变的诊断意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The major neutralizing epitope, the “a” determinant of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype E surface antigen (HBsAg) is most divergent from that of genotype A, which is used for preparing monoclonal antibodies used in commercially available HBV reagents. To evaluate the performance of the latest generation of HBsAg detection assays with respect to genotype E HBsAg. Three commercial assays were evaluated using sera from 200 Nigerian patients compared to the preS/S sequence of DNA positive samples. Out of 200 samples, 61 and 103 gave concordant positive and negative results between the three HBsAg assays. Of 36 samples with discordant results, 35 were confirmed negative by neutralisation. One of the three assays showed significantly high rate of false positives (29 of 35). DNA positive samples with no detectable HBsAg or reduced HBsAg detection signals (<75% of mean signal obtained with HBsAg positive samples) revealed several mutations (V14A, F46S, N48T, L49R, I49T, D51G, A53V, P54L, Q82P, F83C, L127P, A184V, T189I, S204N, V224A), mostly outside the a-determinant. Several of these mutations are found as wild type nucleotides normally in genotype A and only exceptionally in genotype E. All three assays showed comparable sensitivities for genotype E HBsAg detection (98.4–100%) but differed considerably in specificity (84–99%). Failure to detect HBsAg antigen and differences in signal intensity were mainly associated with mutations in the preS/S gene outside the “a” determinant.
机译:主要的中和表位,即乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)基因型E表面抗原(HBsAg)的“ a”决定簇,与基因型A的差异最大,后者用于制备市售HBV试剂中使用的单克隆抗体。为了评估关于基因型E HBsAg的最新一代HBsAg检测方法的性能。使用来自200名尼日利亚患者的血清与DNA阳性样品的preS / S序列进行比较,评估了三种商业化验方法。在200个样本中,有61个和103个在三种HBsAg测定之间给出了一致的阳性和阴性结果。在36个结果不一致的样本中,有35个被中和证实为阴性。三种测定之一表明假阳性率很高(35中的29)。没有检测到HBsAg或HBsAg检测信号降低的DNA阳性样品(

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号