首页> 外文期刊>Maternal and Child Health Journal >Evaluation of Pregnancy Mortality in Louisiana Using Enhanced Linkage and Different Indicators Defined by WHO and CDC/ACOG: Challenging and Practical Issues
【24h】

Evaluation of Pregnancy Mortality in Louisiana Using Enhanced Linkage and Different Indicators Defined by WHO and CDC/ACOG: Challenging and Practical Issues

机译:使用增强的联系和世卫组织和疾病预防控制中心/世界卫生组织疾病预防控制中心确定的不同指标评估路易斯安那州的孕产妇死亡率:挑战和实际问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Differences in definitions and methods of data collection on deaths occurring during or shortly after pregnancy have created confusion and challenges in evaluating research findings. The study aimed to determine if the use of enhanced linkage procedures improve data collection of deaths occurring during or shortly after pregnancy, and how different definitions of those deaths changed the results of data analysis. The study used 2000–2005 Louisiana Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (LPMSS) and 2000–2005 death certificates linked with 1999–2005 live birth and fetal death certificates. Five indicators of deaths occurring during or shortly after pregnancy using WHO and CDC/ACOG definitions were estimated. One-sided Spearman rank test was used to analyze maternal mortality trends from 2000 to 2005. Of 345 women who died within 1 year of pregnancy, 187 were identified through linkage; 38 of those were missed by the LPMSS. Total mortality ratios of deaths occurring within 1 year of pregnancy ranged from 13.4 to 88.9 per 100,000 live births depending on the indicator used. CDC/ACOG pregnancy-related death and pregnancy-associated death statistically increased, whereas WHO pregnancy-related death decreased between 2000 and 2005. The most common causes of death differed by indicator. Universal adoption of linkage procedures could improve data on deaths occurring during or shortly after pregnancy. Estimates, trends, and most common causes of death were markedly different depending on which indicator was used. Additionally, the use of different mortality indicators during analysis provides a more detailed picture of potential target areas for future research and interventions.
机译:关于妊娠期间或之后不久发生的死亡的数据收集的定义和方法的差异,给评估研究结果造成了困惑和挑战。该研究旨在确定使用增强的连锁程序是否可以改善妊娠期间或妊娠后发生的死亡数据收集,以及这些死亡的不同定义如何改变数据分析的结果。该研究使用了2000–2005年路易斯安那州怀孕死亡率监测系统(LPMSS)和2000–2005年死亡证书以及1999–2005年活产和胎儿死亡证书。根据WHO和CDC / ACOG的定义,估计了五个在怀孕期间或之后不久发生的死亡指标。用单侧Spearman等级检验分析了2000年至2005年的孕产妇死亡率趋势。在怀孕1年以内死亡的345名妇女中,有187例通过联系确定; LPMSS错过了其中的38个。根据所使用的指标,在​​怀孕1年内发生的死亡总死亡率在每100,000例活产中13.4至88.9之间。 CDC / ACOG与妊娠有关的死亡和与妊娠有关的死亡在统计学上有所增加,而WHO与妊娠有关的死亡在2000年至2005年之间有所下降。最常见的死亡原因因指标而异。普遍采用联动程序可以改善怀孕期间或之后不久发生的死亡数据。根据所使用的指标,估计,趋势和最常见的死亡原因明显不同。此外,在分析过程中使用不同的死亡率指标可以为将来研究和干预的潜在目标领域提供更详细的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号