首页> 外文期刊>Mass Communication and Society >Integrating Theoretical Traditions in Media Effects: Using Third-Person Effects to Link Agenda-Setting and Cultivation
【24h】

Integrating Theoretical Traditions in Media Effects: Using Third-Person Effects to Link Agenda-Setting and Cultivation

机译:在媒体特效中整合理论传统:使用第三人称特效来链接议程设置和培养

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In an earlier period of mass communication research, scholars were more adventuresome in advancing “new” theories and less hesitant to “create” theory. The 1970s, in particular, bore witness to the emergence of several such theories—from the knowledge gap and agenda-setting to cultivation. Scholars have generated substantial literatures elaborating work in these and other traditions. Those contributions are now sufficiently robust that it is time to direct some of our energies toward synthesizing theories. This article nominates third-person perception as a candidate for such integration. Several prominent theories of media effects in the mass communication literature are selected to illustrate how the theories can or have been integrated. Results from three surveys provided evidence that the theories of third-person perception, agenda-setting and cultivation can be interrelated. The proposition examined here can serve as a model for further integration of other media theories. This integration attempt harkened back to the times when theory building in media effects was more common and perhaps more optimistic about explaining processes of influence.
机译:在大众传播研究的早期,学者们在推进“新”理论上更具冒险精神,而对“创造”理论则毫不犹豫。尤其是1970年代,见证了许多这样的理论的出现-从知识鸿沟和议程设定到耕作。学者们积累了大量的文学作品,阐述了这些传统和其他传统。这些贡献现在已经足够强大,现在是时候将我们的一些精力引导到综合理论上了。本文提名了第三人称视角作为这种整合的候选者。在大众传播文学中选择了几种著名的媒体效应理论来说明这些理论是如何整合的。来自三项调查的结果提供了证据,表明第三人称感知,议程设置和培养的理论可以相互关联。这里讨论的命题可以作为进一步整合其他媒体理论的模型。这种整合尝试可以追溯到媒体效应理论构建更为普遍并且可能更乐于解释影响过程的时代。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号