首页> 外文期刊>Masonry international >A Comparative Study into the Tensile Bond Strength of the Brick Mortar Interface of Natural Hydraulic Lime and Portland Cement Mortars
【24h】

A Comparative Study into the Tensile Bond Strength of the Brick Mortar Interface of Natural Hydraulic Lime and Portland Cement Mortars

机译:天然水硬石灰与硅酸盐水泥砂浆砖砂浆界面抗拉强度的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This project was designed to compare and contrast the performance characteristics and properties of a variety of different mortar mixes, with the entire sample set being tested at 28 days. Volume proportioned mortar mixes were produced using both eminently hydraulic lime (NHL5) and Portland cement to give target performance strength specifications of M2, M4 and M6. These target strength specifications are equivalent to traditional volume proportions of 1:3, 1:6 and 1:8. In each case the mortars were made using a constant mass of sand and the correct proportions of each mortar mix were obtained by varying the mass of binder used. This was designed to give greater control over the water content of each mix. Bond strength tests were performed on couplets using a direct tensile test, developed at Sheffield Hallam University. The results indicated that Portland cement mortars consistently performed better than the corresponding hydraulic lime mortars in terms of tensile bond strength. However, the results also indicated that the higher mix proportion limes did compare favourably with the lower proportioned cement based mortars.
机译:该项目旨在比较和对比各种不同砂浆混合物的性能特征和性能,整个样品组在28天进行测试。使用著名的水硬石灰(NHL5)和波特兰水泥生产按体积比例混合的砂浆混合物,以达到M2,M4和M6的目标性能强度规格。这些目标强度规格等效于传统体积比例1:3、1:6和1:8。在每种情况下,砂浆都是使用恒定质量的沙子制成的,并且通过改变所用粘合剂的质量可以获得每种砂浆混合物的正确比例。旨在更好地控制每种混合物的水分含量。结合强度测试是使用谢菲尔德哈勒姆大学开发的直接拉伸试验在对联上进行的。结果表明,就拉伸粘结强度而言,波特兰水泥砂浆的性能始终优于相应的水硬性石灰砂浆。但是,结果还表明,混合比例较高的石灰与比例较低的水泥基砂浆相比确实具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号