首页> 外文期刊>Marine pollution bulletin >Measuring and monitoring persistent organic pollutants in the context of risk assessment
【24h】

Measuring and monitoring persistent organic pollutants in the context of risk assessment

机译:在风险评估中测量和监测持久性有机污染物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Due to growing concerns regarding persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the environment, extensive studies and monitoring programs have been carried out in the last two decades to determine their concentrations in water, sediment, and more recently, in biota. An extensive review and analysis of the existing literature shows that whilst the vast majority of these efforts either attempt to compare (a) spatial changes (to identify "hot spots"), or (b) temporal changes to detect deterioration/improvement occurring in the environment, most studies could not provide sufficient statistical power to estimate concentrations of POPs in the environment and detect spatial and temporal changes. Despite various national POPs standards having been established, there has been a surprising paucity of emphasis in establishing accurate threshold concentrations that indicate potential significant threats to ecosystems and public health. Although most monitoring programs attempt to check compliance through reference to certain "environmental quality objectives", it should be pointed out that many of these established standards are typically associated with a large degree of uncertainty and rely on a large number of assumptions, some of which may be arbitrary. Non-compliance should trigger concern, so that the problem can be tracked down and rectified, but non-compliance must not be interpreted in a simplistic and mechanical way. Contaminants occurring in the physical environment may not necessarily be biologically available, and even when they are bioavailable, they may not necessarily elicit adverse biological effects at the individual or population levels. As such, we here argue that routine monitoring and reporting of abiotic and biotic POPs concentrations could be of limited use, unless such data can be related directly to the assessment of public health and ecological risks. Risk can be inferred from the ratio of predicted environmental concentration (PEC) and the predicted no effect concentration (PNEC). Currently, the paucity of data does not allow accurate estimation of PNEC, and future endeavors should therefore, be devoted to determine the threshold concentrations of POPs that can cause undesirable biological effects on sensitive receivers and important biological components in the receiving environment (e.g. keystone species, populations with high energy flow values, etc.), to enable derivation of PNECs based on solid scientific evidence and reduce uncertainty. Using the threshold body burden of POPs required to elicit damages of lysosomal integrity in the green mussel (Perna virvidis) as an example, we illustrate how measurement of POPs in body tissue could be used in predicting environmental risk in a meaningful way.
机译:由于人们日益关注环境中的持久性有机污染物(POPs),因此在过去的二十年中进行了广泛的研究和监测计划,以确定其在水,沉积物中以及最近在生物区系中的浓度。对现有文献的广泛回顾和分析表明,尽管这些努力中的绝大部分试图比较(a)空间变化(以识别“热点”),或(b)时间变化以检测在生产过程中发生的恶化/改善。在环境中,大多数研究无法提供足够的统计能力来估计环境中POPs的浓度并检测时空变化。尽管已经建立了各种国家持久性有机污染物标准,但令人惊讶的是,缺乏足够的重视来确定准确的阈值浓度,以指示对生态系统和公共健康的潜在重大威胁。尽管大多数监视程序都尝试通过参考某些“环境质量目标”来检查合规性,但应指出的是,这些既定标准中的许多通常与很大程度的不确定性相关,并依赖于大量假设,其中一些假设可能是任意的。不合规应引起关注,以便可以追查并纠正问题,但决不能以简单和机械的方式来解释不合规。在物理环境中发生的污染物不一定是生物可用的,即使它们是生物可用的,也不一定会在个人或人群的水平上引起不利的生物学影响。因此,我们认为,非生物和生物持久性有机污染物浓度的常规监测和报告可能用途有限,除非此类数据可以直接与评估公共健康和生态风险相关。可以从预测环境浓度(PEC)与无作用预测浓度(PNEC)之比推断出风险。当前,由于缺乏数据,无法准确估计PNEC,因此,应致力于未来的努力,以确定可能对敏感接收者和接收环境中重要的生物成分(例如,关键物种)产生不利影响的POPs阈值浓度。 ,具有高能量流值的人口等),以便能够基于可靠的科学证据推导PNEC,并减少不确定性。以在青口贻贝(Perna virvidis)中引起溶酶体完整性破坏所需的POPs阈值身体负担为例,我们说明了如何利用体内组织中POPs的测量以有意义的方式预测环境风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号