Finnaprow flooding

摘要

1. Neither the bridge handover and arrival procedures, together with their associated documentation, nor the indication equipment were effective at alerting the bridge team to the status of the fin stabilisers. 2. Fatigue might have contributed to the accident given the types of error made by the day master and chief officer and their work patterns leading up to the accident. 3. The crew's response to the flooding could have been more effective and it was fortunate that the vessel sustained flooding to only one compartment. 4. The SMS lacked effective guidance that would have helped the crew deal with the emergency. 5. The crew were insufficiently familiar with the vessel's equipment, and lack of effective flooding drills hampered the damage control effort. 6. The accident has demonstrated that the SMS was in need of an internal safety audit and corrective action as identified in the vessel's recent PSC inspection.