...
首页> 外文期刊>Manufacturing and service operations management >Centralizing Inventory in Supply Chains by Using Shaplev Value to Allocate the Profits
【24h】

Centralizing Inventory in Supply Chains by Using Shaplev Value to Allocate the Profits

机译:使用Shaplev值分配利润集中供应链中的库存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How should the excess profit because of inventory pooling be shared amongst firms at different levels along the supply chain? Suppose each of several retailers observes local demand for a common item and places an order at the supplier, which is immediately filled if the supplier has the item in stock. The supplier can fill retailer orders either from their reserved inventories or from a shareable pool of inventory. Using terminology from cooperative game theory, we say that the supplier and the retailers whose orders are filled from the common pool have formed an inventory-pooling coalition and study the use of Shapley value to allocate the expected excess profit because of pooling. We find that under Shapley value allocations the retailers have incentive to join the inventory-pooling coalition, and the supplier carries the level of inventory that is optimal for the coalition. Shapley value allocations might not lie within the core of the game, but the grand coalition of all players is stable in the farsighted sense. And, although the supplier's share of the expected excess profit is largest when all the retailers participate in the inventory-pooling coalition, the allocations to the retailers may diminish as the coalition grows. Colluding against the supplier (by merging and forming larger retailers) may seem like an appealing strategy for the retailers to increase their share of the total supply chain profit, but we find that the total expected after-pooling profits of retailers may instead go down because of collusion.
机译:因库存集中而产生的超额利润应如何在供应链中不同层次的公司之间共享?假设几家零售商中的每家都观察到本地对某个共同物品的需求,并向供应商下订单,如果供应商有该物品,则立即将其填满。供应商可以从其保留的库存或可共享的库存池中填写零售商的订单。我们使用合作博弈论中的术语,说从公共资源池中完成订单的供应商和零售商已经组成了一个存货池联盟,并研究了利用Shapley值来分配由于资源池而产生的预期超额利润。我们发现,在Shapley价值分配下,零售商具有加入库存集中联盟的动机,而供应商则提供了最适合联盟的库存水平。 Shapley的价值分配可能不属于游戏的核心,但从远见来看,所有玩家的庞大联盟都是稳定的。而且,尽管当所有零售商都参与库存合并联盟时,供应商在预期超额利润中所占的份额最大,但是随着联盟的发展,分配给零售商的资金可能会减少。与供应商串通(通过合并和组建更大的零售商)对于零售商来说,增加其在供应链总利润中的份额似乎是一种有吸引力的策略,但我们发现零售商的预期合并后利润总额可能会下降,因为合谋。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号