首页> 外文期刊>Literary & linguistic computing >Towards an intellectual history of digitization: Myths, dystopias, and discursive shifts in museum computing
【24h】

Towards an intellectual history of digitization: Myths, dystopias, and discursive shifts in museum computing

机译:迈向数字化的历史:神话,反乌托邦和博物馆计算中的话语转换

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent contributions have highlighted that the advent of digital technologies in the humanities is the object of different and even polarized narratives, which frame the effects of digitization either in utopian or dystopian terms. In this light, technology-centred narratives should be complemented by an intellectual history of technology-related "myths and dystopias", in order to increase our understanding of how digital technologies are presented in the disciplinary and public debates. Whereas this type of analysis has taken its start from library science and the digital humanities, however, it is still in its infancy within the field of museum computing. To this purpose, the article provides an interpretive and critical review of the debate on the automated cataloguing and digitization of museum collections. It highlights a sequence of discursive shifts in time since the 1960s to the present decade are identified and discussed: namely, a phase of "standardization", followed by "the museum of the Information Society" and, most recently, a "post-modernist utopia" which dominates the current debate. Each new paradigm tends at the same time to reverse and "re-mediate" some characteristics of former phases, generating controversies that are likely to proceed until more empirical knowledge is collected about the actual impacts of digital media on museums.
机译:最新的著作强调了数字技术在人文科学中的出现是不同甚至两极分化的叙述的对象,这些叙述以乌托邦或反乌托邦的方式构筑了数字化的影响。因此,以技术为中心的叙述应辅以与技术有关的“神话和反乌托邦”的知识史,以加深我们对纪律和公开辩论中如何展示数字技术的理解。尽管这种分析是从图书馆学和数字人文科学开始的,但是在博物馆计算领域仍处于起步阶段。为此,本文对博物馆藏品的自动分类和数字化辩论提供了解释性和批判性的评论。它着重指出并讨论了从1960年代到当前十年的一系列时间变化过程:即“标准化”阶段,其次是“信息社会博物馆”,最近是“后现代主义者”乌托邦”。每个新范例都倾向于同时扭转和“补救”以前阶段的某些特征,从而引发争议,直到收集到更多有关数字媒体对博物馆实际影响的经验知识之后,这种争论才可能继续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号