...
首页> 外文期刊>Library Review >Regional and international research collaboration and citation impact in selected sub-Saharan African countries in the period 2000 to 2019
【24h】

Regional and international research collaboration and citation impact in selected sub-Saharan African countries in the period 2000 to 2019

机译:2000年至2019年选定的撒哈拉非洲国家的区域和国际研究合作和引用影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose-This paper aims to examine and compares the extent and types of research collaboration and their citation impact in selected countries in sub-Saharan Africa using co-authorship amongst countries as a proxy indicator. Design/methodology/approach-The paper reports the findings of a bibliometric study of publications that were published by authors affiliated to Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria and Tanzania, between 2000 and 2019 and indexed in the Web of Science's (WoS) three citation indexes. The social network analysis technique was adopted to articulate collaborative partnerships between and amongst geographical regions. Correlational tests were conducted to gauge the relationship between the frequency and intensity of collaboration and the influence of collaboration on citation impact. The paper highlights the characteristics of country collaborations, the nature of collaboration and the corresponding research impact and relates the types of collaboration to citation impacts in each country. Findings-The findings reveal that Nigeria and Kenya have had wider and stronger collaborations than Ethiopia, Ghana and Tanzania; the number of collaborating countries has continued to grow in the five countries' research ecosystems; there are statistically significant relationships between collaboration and citation impact in each country; international collaboration has yielded the most number of citations, with the global North performing better than the South and regional countries; and that the number of citations for the countries more than doubles through research collaboration. Research limitations/implications-Co-authorship of publications has been faulted but remains the most reliable proxy indicator of research collaboration. The study of the five countries, though depicting patterns of collaboration in many sub-Saharan African countries, cannot be generalised to the entire region. Practical implications-The current study has policy implications as far as decisions on research collaboration are concerned. Sub-Saharan African countries and indeed the developing countries may consider re-examining their emphasis on international collaboration to the neglect of domestic and regional collaboration While the study supports international collaboration, it nevertheless recommends a three-tier collaboration, wherein international collaboration is juxtaposed with domestic and/or regional collaboration. Originality/value-The study uses social network analysis of country collaboration in developing countries. The intensity and frequency of collaboration are examined in relation to research impact.
机译:目的 - 本文旨在审查和比较亚撒哈拉以南非洲所选国家的研究合作及其引文影响的程度和类型。设计/方法/方法 - 论文报告了向埃塞俄比亚,加纳,肯尼亚,尼日利亚和坦桑尼亚附属的作者发表的发布的发布研究结果,在2000年至2019年期间,并在科学网络(WOS)三引文中索引索引。采用社会网络分析技术清楚地理区域之间和之间的协作伙伴关系。进行相关试验以衡量协作频率和强度与协作对引文撞击影响的关系。本文突出了国家合作的特点,合作的性质以及相应的研究影响,并将合作类型与每个国家的引用影响相关。调查结果 - 调查结果表明,尼日利亚和肯尼亚的合作比埃塞俄比亚,加纳和坦桑尼亚更广泛。合作国家的数量继续在五个国家的研究生态系统中增长;每个国家的协作和引用影响之间存在统计学上的关系;国际合作产生了最多的引文,全球北方表现优于南部和区域国家;并通过研究协作,各国的引用人数超过双打。研究限制/含义 - 出版物的共同作者已经出现故障,但仍然是最可靠的研究合作代理指标。该五个国家的研究虽然描述了许多撒哈拉以南非洲国家的合作模式,但不能通过整个地区。实际意义 - 目前的研究与对研究合作的决定有关的决策具有政策影响。撒哈拉以南非洲国家,实际上,发展中国家可以考虑重新审查他们对忽视国内和区域合作的重视,而研究支持国际合作,但建议进行三层合作,其中国际合作是并置的国内和/或区域合作。原创性/价值 - 研究采用发展中国家国家合作的社会网络分析。关于研究影响,检查了合作的强度和频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号