首页> 外文期刊>Library Journal >The 'Verdict' on Reviews
【24h】

The 'Verdict' on Reviews

机译:评论的“裁决”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For Decades, Library Journal Reviews Have concluded by recommending titles for particular types of libraries or collections, with an occasional nod to a type of reader-the generalist, the student, the fan. Phrases like "highly recommended for larger libraries," "recommended for medium-sized and large fiction collections," and "for academic libraries only" have been standard fare at the end of reviews. Librarians know the drill so well that many just skip to that final sentence to get the recommendation and move on. They're looking for the quick yea or nay cum evaluation.
机译:对于《十年》,图书馆期刊评论的结论是为特定类型的图书馆或馆藏推荐书名,并偶尔向读者(即通才,学生和支持者)致意。评论结尾处的标准价格包括“强烈推荐用于大型图书馆”,“推荐用于中型和大型小说收藏”和“仅用于学术图书馆”。图书馆员非常了解这次演习,以至于许多人只是跳到最后一句话来获得推荐并继续前进。他们正在寻找快速的是或否评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号