...
【24h】

Editorial

机译:社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Welcome to Volume 15, Issue 4. On the surface there are four quite different papers to be found here, although they are all linked by the passion with which their authors wish to argue their cases. There are, however, other links. The paper "Organizational learning and the learning organization: reviewing evolution for prospecting the future" by Teresa Rebelo and Adelino Gomes, is looking firmly to the future, seeking guidelines for future learning organisation development. Their use of the Reichers and Schneider (1990) model of the evolution of concepts provides an interesting way of determining where the learning organisation has got to in terms of research development. Their findings argue that, "to overcome the criticism and consolidate the concepts, a substantial investment in cumulative empirical research into topics that involve or are influenced by organizational learning is essential, as well as an effort to clarity some questions that are still confused in the literature, such as the 'who learns' and 'how organizations learn' questions". It can be argued that the other three papers in the issue are part of a move towards development of such empirical research.
机译:欢迎来到第15卷,第4期。表面上有四篇完全不同的论文,尽管它们全都与作者希望争论自己的论点的热情联系在一起。但是,还有其他链接。邓丽君(Teresa Rebelo)和阿德利诺·戈麦斯(Adelino Gomes)撰写的论文“组织学习与学习组织:回顾进化,展望未来”正在坚定地展望未来,并为未来学习组织的发展寻求指导。他们对概念演变的Reichers和Schneider(1990)模型的使用提供了一种有趣的方式来确定学习型组织在研究开发方面所处的位置。他们的发现认为,“为了克服批评并巩固概念,对涉及组织学习或受组织学习影响的主题的累积经验研究进行大量投资是必不可少的,同时还需要努力澄清一些仍在学习中混淆的问题。文献,例如“谁学习”和“组织如何学习”问题”。可以说,本期的其他三篇论文是这种经验研究发展的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号