首页> 外文期刊>KSCE journal of civil engineering >Comparative investigation into field performance of steel bridge deck asphalt overlay systems
【24h】

Comparative investigation into field performance of steel bridge deck asphalt overlay systems

机译:钢桥面沥青铺面体系田间性能对比研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The steel bridge deck overlay provides a smooth surface for riding and protects the deck from influence of traffic and environment factors. The presence of distress on overlay may compromise the serviceability of a bridge. A better understanding of distress is indispensable for designers to make improvements on asphalt overlay to extend the service life. A field investigation into performance of two bridge deck asphalt overlay systems was conducted. The overlay system included an epoxy asphalt overlay and a composite asphalt overlay consisting of Stone-Matrix-Asphalt (SMA) and Gussasphalt (GA). The field investigation was conducted to evaluate the difference in performance between two systems. Chemical analyses were performed on core samples from each bridge to further investigate the distress mechanism of each system. Results indicated that the two overlay systems generally exhibited similar field performance. Each bridge developed different distress, mainly due to the poor bonding between layers or between overlay and steel deck.
机译:钢桥面覆盖层可为骑行提供光滑的表面,并保护桥面不受交通和环境因素的影响。覆盖物上遇险可能会损害桥梁的使用寿命。对于设计师来说,更好地了解遇险状况对于改善沥青覆盖层以延长使用寿命是必不可少的。对两个桥面沥青覆盖系统的性能进行了现场调查。覆盖层系统包括环氧沥青覆盖层和由石基沥青(SMA)和Gussasphalt(GA)组成的复合沥青覆盖层。进行了现场调查以评估两个系统之间的性能差异。对来自每个桥的岩心样品进行了化学分析,以进一步研究每个系统的遇险机理。结果表明,两个覆盖系统通常表现出相似的现场性能。每座桥梁的遇险程度不同,主要是由于层之间或覆盖层与钢桥面之间的粘结不良。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号