首页> 外文期刊>The Korean journal of defense analysis >Analysis of the Positions Held by Countries on Legal Issues of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and Proper Domestic Policy Direction of South Korea
【24h】

Analysis of the Positions Held by Countries on Legal Issues of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and Proper Domestic Policy Direction of South Korea

机译:各国致命自治武器系统法律问题持有的职位及韩国妥善国内政策方向分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems ( LAWS) are being developed by major countries as a core value of future war. The international community is actively discussing the legal issues and regulatory methods of LAWS at the Group of Government Experts (GGE) meetings hosted by the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW). The main purpose of the first part of this paper is to compare and analyze countries' positions on each issue at the above GGE. At the GGE, there are contrasting stances between those supporting and opposing strict regulations on LAWS. A consensus was not reached on the definition of LAWS and the necessity to create a new treaty that regulates LAWS. However, most countries and NGOs are trying to find a methodology for autonomous weapons to comply with international humanitarian law through "human elements." It is difficult to expect the creation of a new treaty, so the recent GGE has emphasized the solution through Article 36 of Additional Protocol I. Based on the discussions at the GGE, the second part of this paper will examine the proper policy direction that South Korea can set for LAWS. The issues and trends discussed in the GGE need to be fully understood by government policy makers and defense industry experts. In addition, in order to clarify the implementation of Article 36, it is possible to use a method to prepare regulations in domestic laws or codes of conduct to test compliance with international laws on new weapons including LAWS. As to whether or not to create the new treaty, diplomatic channels can carefully consider options for participating in European-led political declarations. Finally, an accurate understanding of the U.S. position on LAWS regulations is needed, and government-led research and development can play an important role in promoting international solidarity among allies.
机译:主要国家是由未来战争的核心价值制定的致命自主武器制度(法律)。国际社会正在积极讨论“关于使用某些常规武器(CCW)的禁令或限制的公约”举办的政府专家(GGE)会议上的法律问题和监管法律方法。本文第一部分的主要目的是比较和分析上述每个问题的国家职位。在GGE,在那些支持方面存在对比的阶段,并对法律的严格规定。对法律的定义并不需要建立一个规定法律的新条约的必要性达成共识。然而,大多数国家和非政府组织正试图找到一种自治武器的方法,以通过“人类要素”来遵守国际人道主义法。很难期望创造一个新的条约,因此最近的GGE通过另外的议定书第36条强调了解决方案I.根据GGE的讨论,本文的第二部分将审查南方的适当政策方向韩国可以为法律设定。 GGE讨论的问题和趋势需要通过政府决策者和国防工业专家完全理解。此外,为了澄清第36条的实施,可以使用一种方法来编制国内法律或行为准则的法规,以测试遵守涉及法律的新武器的国际法。至于是否创建新条约,外交渠道可以仔细考虑参加欧盟政治声明的选项。最后,对美国法律规定的准确理解是必要的,政府主导的研发可以在促进盟友之间的国际团结方面发挥重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号