...
首页> 外文期刊>Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy >The value of magnetic resonance imaging in our current management of ACL and meniscal injuries
【24h】

The value of magnetic resonance imaging in our current management of ACL and meniscal injuries

机译:磁共振成像在当前ACL和半月板损伤管理中的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and meniscal injuries. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the reliability and value of MRI in our management of ACL and meniscal tears. 138 patients who had undergone a MRI to confirm or refute the clinical diagnosis of an ACL or meniscal tear were identified. Those who had subsequently undergone arthroscopy were selected. MRI findings and clinical diagnosis were compared with those at arthroscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy of clinical diagnosis and MRI were then calculated. The overall accuracy for MRI was 91, 68 and 86% for detecting ACL, medial meniscal and lateral meniscal tears, respectively. Accuracy for clinical diagnosis was 90 and 64% for ACL and meniscal tears, respectively. In contrast to other series, our results indicate a lower accuracy of MRI in detecting pathology, especially of the ACL and medial meniscus. We noted a low sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value but a high negative predictive value rendering MRI most useful as a negative diagnostic tool. We suggest that where symptoms and clinical findings support one of these diagnoses and arthroscopic therapeutic intervention is contemplated, that MRI scanning is not always beneficial. Our current practice of requesting scans to routinely confirm the diagnosis should be altered. Unnecessary MRI scanning increases the financial burden and delays patient treatment.
机译:磁共振成像(MRI)通常用于诊断前十字韧带(ACL)和半月板损伤。这项回顾性研究的目的是确定MRI在我们处理ACL和半月板撕裂中的可靠性和价值。确定了138例接受MRI证实或反驳ACL或半月板撕裂的临床诊断的患者。选择那些随后接受关节镜检查的患者。 MRI检查结果和临床诊断与关节镜检查相比较。然后计算敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV)以及临床诊断和MRI的总体准确性。 MRI检测ACL,半月板内侧和半月板外侧撕裂的总体准确性分别为91%,68%和86%。 ACL和半月板撕裂的临床诊断准确率分别为90%和64%。与其他系列相比,我们的结果表明MRI在检测病理学,尤其是ACL和内侧半月板病理学方面的准确性较低。我们注意到敏感性,特异性和阳性预测值较低,但阴性预测值较高,使得MRI最可用作阴性诊断工具。我们建议,如果症状和临床发现支持这些诊断之一,并且考虑进行关节镜治疗干预,则MRI扫描并不总是有益的。我们目前要求扫描以常规确认诊断的做法应予以更改。不必要的MRI扫描会增加经济负担并延迟患者治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号