首页> 外文期刊>JPKE:journal of post keynesian economics >Classical political economy: the subsistence wage, and job guarantee concerns
【24h】

Classical political economy: the subsistence wage, and job guarantee concerns

机译:古典政治经济学:维持生计的工资和工作保障问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the theoretical framework of classical political economy, including the revisions of Marx and the more recent work of Piero Sraffa and others, the concept of the subsistence wage figures prominently. Here, following a recounting of this concept and demonstrating its significance not only for classical theory but also for larger social concerns, I argue that the "base wage" (as it is sometimes termed) as articulated within a "Job Guarantee" program, is (or should be) comparable to the subsistence wage but requires modification to make it (roughly) equivalent. It will be demonstrated that adherents of the classical approach did not rest their wage theory on a quasi-neoclassical supply demand approach (with some primitive marginal productivity notion lying behind a supposed demand for labor schedule), but understood wages as socially determined where institutional and historic forces established a normative standard around which market wages gravitated. Such an approach was shared by, among others, Thorstein Veblen and John Maynard Keynes.
机译:在古典政治经济学的理论框架中,包括对马克思的修改以及皮耶罗·斯拉法(Piero Sraffa)等人的最新著作,维持生计工资的概念非常重要。在这里,在重新叙述这个概念并证明其不仅对于古典理论而且对于更广泛的社会关注的意义之后,我认为“工作保障”计划中阐明的“基本工资”(有时被称为)是(或应该)与基本工资相当,但需要进行修改以使其(大致)相等。可以证明,经典方法的拥护者并未将其工资理论基于准新古典的供给需求方法(某些原始的边际生产率概念落后于对劳动时间表的假定需求),而是将工资理解为由社会决定的制度和制度。历史势力建立了规范的标准,使市场工资趋于诱人。 Thorstein Veblen和John Maynard Keynes等人分享了这种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号