首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Zhejiang University. Science >Water and heat transport in hilly red soil of southern China: II. Modeling and simulation
【24h】

Water and heat transport in hilly red soil of southern China: II. Modeling and simulation

机译:中国南方丘陵红壤的水和热传递:II。建模与仿真

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Simulation models of heat and water transport have not been rigorously tested for the red sods of southern China Based on the theory of nonisothermal water-heat coupled transfer, a simulation model, programmed in Visual Basic 6 0, was developed to predict the coupled transfer of water and heat in hilly red soil. A series of soil column experiments for so. water and heat transfer, including soil columns with closed and evaporating top ends, were used to test the simulation mode . Results showed that in the closed columns, the temporal and spatial distribution of moisture and heat could be very well predicted by he model while in the evaporating columns, the simulated soil water contents were somewhat different from the observed ones. In the heat flow equation by Taylor and Lary (1964), the effect of soil water evaporation on the heat flow is not involved, which may be the main reason for the differences between simulated and observed results. The predicted temperatures were not in agreement with the observed one with thermal conductivities calculated by de Vries and Wierenga equations, so that it is suggested that K_h, soil heat conductivity, be multiplied by 8.0 for the first 6.5 h and by 1.2 later on. Sensitivity analysis of soil water and heat coefficients showed that the saturated hydraulic conductivity, K_s, and the water diffusivity, D(theta), had great effects on soil water transport, the variation of soil porosity led to the difference of soil thermal properties, and accordingly changed temperature redistribution, which would affect water redistribution.
机译:尚未针对中国南方的红草进行严格的热和水传输模拟模型。基于非等温水热耦合传递理论,开发了一种在Visual Basic 6 0中编程的模拟模型,以预测水热耦合传递。丘陵红壤中的水和热量。为此进行了一系列土柱实验。水和热传递,包括顶部封闭且蒸发的土壤柱,用于测试模拟模式。结果表明,在封闭柱中,模型可以很好地预测水分和热量的时空分布,而在蒸发柱中,模拟土壤水含量与观测值有所不同。在Taylor和Lary(1964)提出的热流方程中,没有考虑土壤水分蒸发对热流的影响,这可能是造成模拟结果与观测结果差异的主要原因。预测温度与通过de Vries和Wierenga方程计算出的热导率与观察到的温度不一致,因此建议在前6.5 h将土壤热导率K_h乘以8.0,然后再乘以1.2。对土壤水和热系数的敏感性分析表明,饱和导水率K_s和水扩散系数D(theta)对土壤水分运移有很大影响,土壤孔隙度的变化导致土壤热性质的差异,以及相应地改变了温度的重新分配,这将影响水的重新分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号