首页> 外文期刊>Journal of World Investment & Trade; Law, Economics, Politics >Nationalizing the Hydrocarbon Industry in Venezuela: Venezuela Holdings, BV, Mobil Cerro Negro Holding, Ltd., Mobil Venezolana de Petroleos Holdings, Inc., Mobil Cerro Negro, Ltd., and Mobil Venezolana de Petroleos, Inc. v The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/27, Award, 9 October 2014 (Gilbert Guillaume, Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Ahmed Sadek El-Kosheri)
【24h】

Nationalizing the Hydrocarbon Industry in Venezuela: Venezuela Holdings, BV, Mobil Cerro Negro Holding, Ltd., Mobil Venezolana de Petroleos Holdings, Inc., Mobil Cerro Negro, Ltd., and Mobil Venezolana de Petroleos, Inc. v The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/27, Award, 9 October 2014 (Gilbert Guillaume, Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Ahmed Sadek El-Kosheri)

机译:委内瑞拉的碳氢化合物产业国有化:委内瑞拉控股有限公司,美孚塞罗内格罗控股公司,美孚委内瑞拉石油公司控股有限公司,美孚塞罗内格罗有限公司和美孚委内瑞拉石油公司诉v委内瑞拉玻利瓦尔共和国,国际投资争端解决中心案例号ARB / 07/27,裁决,2014年10月9日(吉尔伯特·纪尧姆,加布里埃尔·考夫曼·科勒,艾哈迈德·萨德克·科谢里)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Investment treaty arbitration offers few awards on nationalizations. The Award in Mobilv Venezuela (Mobil) is one of them. Maybe because of this, it is a rather disappointing decision to read for those concerned with international investment law. The Claimants (Venezuela Holdings, Mobil Cerro Negro Holding, Mobil Venezolana de Petroleos Holdings, Mobil Cerro Negro and Mobil Venezolana de Petroleos) alleged violations of the provisions on expropriation, fair and equitable treatment (FET) and arbitrary or discriminatory measures of the 1991 Netherlands-Venezuela bilateral investment treaty (the BIT). In the Award, the Tribunal did not elaborate on the rich case law available on expropriation and FET. Instead, the Tribunal simply repeated some of the criteria already put forward by other international investment tribunals on these issues, scarcely citing any of their awards. The Tribunal focused primarily on the quantum of the nationalized investments, a topic that is generally best suited for accountants rather than lawyers. The facts of the dispute partly explain this situation. They also provide a rare opportunity to remind us how nationalizations work.
机译:投资条约仲裁对国有化的裁决很少。委内瑞拉美孚(Mobilv)奖就是其中之一。也许正因为如此,对于那些关注国际投资法的人来说,这是一个令人失望的决定。索赔人(委内瑞拉控股公司,美孚塞罗黑人控股公司,美孚委内瑞拉石油公司和美孚委内瑞拉石油公司)涉嫌违反了1991年荷兰的没收,公平和平等待遇以及任意或歧视性措施的规定。 -委内瑞拉双边投资条约(BIT)。在裁决中,法庭没有详细说明关于征收和场外交易的丰富判例法。取而代之的是,法庭只是重复了其他国际投资法庭已经针对这些问题提出的一些标准,几乎没有引用它们的任何裁决。法庭主要侧重于国有化投资的范围,这一主题通常最适合会计师而不是律师。争端的事实部分解释了这种情况。它们还提供了难得的机会来提醒我们国有化的工作方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号