...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of World Investment & Trade; Law, Economics, Politics >Distributive Justice and World Trade Law: A Political Theory of International Trade Regulation
【24h】

Distributive Justice and World Trade Law: A Political Theory of International Trade Regulation

机译:分配正义与世界贸易法:国际贸易法规的政治理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I agree: 'We live in an unequal world. This much is beyond dispute' (p. 3). The unequal distribution of wealth within and between countries - the simultaneity of shocking poverty and stunning profusion - is one of the world's most notable features. It is clear that there are reasons for these conditions that have nothing to do with international trade or international law; but it is also clear that international trade, and the way in which it is legally framed, has something to do with it. So, in Distributive Justice and World Trade Law, Oisin Suttle asks head on: 'first, what does justice demand in the regulation of international trade? And second, to what extent does the existing regime for trade in goods respond to those demands?' (pp. 9,177). His answer dives into political theory in the wake of John Rawls to develop a principle of Equality in Global Commerce (EGC). That principle, Suttle clarifies, does not provide a 'grand blueprint... of a just global order' but rather offers 'a standard for judging the justice and injustice of the most important institutions that we find in the world, namely states, and the measures they adopt' (p. 19).
机译:我同意:“我们生活在一个不平等的世界中。这无可争议”(第3页)。国家内部和国家之间的财富分配不均-令人震惊的贫困与惊人的同时发生-是世界上最显着的特征之一。显然,这些条件与国际贸易或国际法无关。但是也很清楚,国际贸易及其合法构成的方式与它有关。因此,在《分配正义与世界贸易法》中,奥伊森·素特尔(Oisin Suttle)问:“首先,正义在国际贸易监管中有什么要求?其次,现有的货物贸易制度在多大程度上对这些需求做出了回应?” (第9,177页)。在约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)建立全球贸易平等(EGC)原则之后,他的回答深入到了政治理论中。萨特尔澄清说,这一原则并没有提供“公正的全球秩序的宏伟蓝图……”,而是提供了“判断我们在世界上发现的最重要机构,即国家和国家的正义与不公正的标准。他们采取的措施”(第19页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号