首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management >Communication Science for Science Communication: Water Management for Oil and Natural Gas Extraction
【24h】

Communication Science for Science Communication: Water Management for Oil and Natural Gas Extraction

机译:科学传播学传播学:石油和天然气开采用水管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Water management for oil and natural gas extraction in the United States has become a topic of public interest and concern. This societal relevance simultaneously heightens the need for rigorous performance and dissemination of scientific work and invites caution from experts who are communicating within what is likely a politicized public conversation. This paper uses interviews to investigate experts' current practices and comfort with communicating about water use for oil and natural gas. Participants cite face-to-face interactions and trust-based relationships as important in their interactions, which is consistent with research about effective communication. However, few participants highlight techniques specific to communicating about water as it relates to oil and gas or about controversial issues generally. Participants also rarely use communication science related to objective setting, framing, and measuring success for improvement, likely in part because of a lack of evidence-based training. In many cases, interviewees expressed attitudes consistent with the deficit model of scientific communication, which holds that presentation of scientific facts will change public opinion. This model has been shown to be relatively ineffective. This paper highlights the need for careful communication and evidence-based opportunities for improvement, including a suggestion that professional societies host communication training and coaching sessions. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:在美国,用于石油和天然气开采的水管理已成为公众关注和关注的话题。这种社会相关性同时提高了对严格执行和传播科学工作的需求,并引起了可能在政治化的公共对话中进行交流的专家的警告。本文通过访谈来调查专家当前的做法以及在交流石油和天然气用水方面的舒适度。参与者认为面对面的互动和基于信任的关系在他们的互动中很重要,这与有效交流的研究一致。但是,很少有参与者强调与水有关的技术,因为水与石油和天然气有关,或与一般有争议的问题有关。参与者也很少使用与目标设定,框架化和衡量成功与否相关的传播科学,部分原因是缺乏基于证据的培训。在许多情况下,受访者表示的态度与科学传播的不足模型相符,认为科学事实的表述将改变公众舆论。该模型已被证明是相对无效的。本文强调需要谨慎的交流和基于证据的改进机会,其中包括建议由专业协会主办交流培训和辅导课程。 (C)2017年美国土木工程师学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号