首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Urban Design >New Landscape Urbanisms: Promising New Paths for Urban Design
【24h】

New Landscape Urbanisms: Promising New Paths for Urban Design

机译:新景观都市主义:有前途的城市设计新途径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In many ways this is a curious debate to still be having. As Matthew Heins' (2015) paper suggests, both New and Landscape Urbanists have imagined this as a territorial battle over urban design, and one with enormous consequences. However, in reality this is not an either-or proposition; no hero from either side will emerge victorious, because both movements have effectively played themselves out. New paradigms for city-making are already supplanting them. These new directions are where the field of urban design should set its sights, but to get there some tidying up is required. Much can still be learnt from the successes and failures of the latest urbanisms so that what emerges is a paradigm that supports both human and natural systems. It is argued here that this will not be what Heins envisions-a collaboration based on commonalities. Rather, promising new paths will explore what the movements failed to address-a deeper understanding of the social ecologies that make sustainability and civic vitality possible in the first place.
机译:从许多方面来看,这仍然是一个令人好奇的辩论。正如Matthew Heins(2015)的论文所暗示的那样,《新都市》和《景观都市主义者》都将这想象为一场关于城市设计的领土之战,并带来了巨大的后果。但是,实际上,这不是一个“或非”的主张。任何一方的英雄都不会胜利,因为两种运动都有效地发挥了作用。城市建设的新范例已经取代了它们。这些新方向是城市设计领域的目光,但要实现这一目标,需要进行一些整理。从最新的城市主义的成功和失败中,仍然可以学到很多东西,因此出现的是支持人类和自然系统的范例。这里有人争辩说,这不是海因斯所设想的-基于共同性的合作。相反,有希望的新道路将探索运动未能解决的问题-更深入地了解社会生态学,这些生态学首先使可持续发展和公民活力成为可能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Urban Design》 |2015年第3期|314-317|共4页
  • 作者

    DAVID DE LA PENA;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Human Ecology, Landscape Architecture Program, University of California, Davis, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号