首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Urban Design >Design review in the UK
【24h】

Design review in the UK

机译:在英国的设计评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As a recent and unprecedented debate in the UK parliament revealed, widespread concern exists regarding the generally poor standards of urban design across the UK, particularly in the speculative housing sector (Hansard 2018). Many argue that concerns about the poor quality of new buildings, public spaces and associated infrastructure play strongly into anti-development attitudes. Indeed, surveys into the social attitudes to new development consistently reveal that the promise of 'better' design is amongst the factors most likely to garner public support for development. Citing such evidence, the 2017 Housing White Paper in England argued that: 'Good design is fundamental to creating healthy and attractive places where people genuinely want to live' and that 73% of people say they would support building more places if they were well designed (DCLG 2017). Similar sentiments are expressed in the other nations of the UK, as reflected in the Scottish Government's 2013 statement, Creating Places, which argues that the design of the built environment can form a focus around which communities can cohere (Scottish Government 2013).
机译:作为英国议会的最近和前所未有的辩论揭示,存在对英国城市设计普遍差的标准,特别是在投机住房部门(Hansard 2018)中存在广泛关注。许多人认为,对新建筑,公共场所和相关基础设施的质量差的担忧强烈地发挥了反发展态度。实际上,对新发展的社会态度进行调查一直展示“更好”设计的承诺是最有可能获得公众对发展的因素。引用这些证据,在英格兰的2017年住房白皮书认为:“良好的设计是创造真正想要生活的健康和有吸引力的地方的基础”,73%的人表示他们将支持更多的地方,如果他们设计得很好(DCLG 2017)。在英国的另一个国家在苏格兰政府2013年的陈述中反映出了类似的情绪,这些国家创造了这些地方,这辩称建筑环境的设计可以形成焦点,社区可以联系(苏格兰政府2013年)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Urban Design》 |2019年第4期|519-522|共4页
  • 作者

    Matthew Carmona;

  • 作者单位

    The Bartlett School of Planning UCL UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号