首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Urban Design >Design review in the UK
【24h】

Design review in the UK

机译:英国的设计审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As a recent and unprecedented debate in the UK parliament revealed, widespread concern exists regarding the generally poor standards of urban design across the UK, particularly in the speculative housing sector (Hansard 2018). Many argue that concerns about the poor quality of new buildings, public spaces and associated infrastructure play strongly into anti-development attitudes. Indeed, surveys into the social attitudes to new development consistently reveal that the promise of 'better' design is amongst the factors most likely to garner public support for development. Citing such evidence, the 2017 Housing White Paper in England argued that: 'Good design is fundamental to creating healthy and attractive places where people genuinely want to live' and that 73% of people say they would support building more places if they were well designed (DCLG 2017). Similar sentiments are expressed in the other nations of the UK, as reflected in the Scottish Government's 2013 statement, Creating Places, which argues that the design of the built environment can form a focus around which communities can cohere (Scottish Government 2013).
机译:正如英国议会最近一场史无前例的辩论所揭示的那样,人们普遍担心整个英国的城市设计标准普遍较差,特别是在投机性住房领域(Hansard 2018)。许多人认为,对新建筑,公共场所和相关基础设施质量不佳的担忧在很大程度上反作用于发展态度。确实,对社会对新发展的态度的调查始终显示,“更好”设计的承诺是最有可能获得公众对发展支持的因素之一。英国《 2017年住房白皮书》援引了这些证据,称:``好的设计对于创造人们真正想要居住的健康和有吸引力的地方至关重要'',并且73%的人说,如果设计得当,他们将支持建造更多的地方(DCLG 2017)。苏格兰政府在2013年发表的《创造场所》声明中也反映出类似的观点在英国其他国家/地区,该声明认为建筑环境的设计可以成为社区可以团结的焦点(苏格兰政府,2013年)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Urban Design》 |2019年第4期|519-522|共4页
  • 作者

    Matthew Carmona;

  • 作者单位

    The Bartlett School of Planning, UCL, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号