...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ultrasound >Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions: Our experience with QelaXtoTM software
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions: Our experience with QelaXtoTM software

机译:剪切波弹性术在辨别恶性和良性乳腺病变中的诊断性能:我们与Qelaxtotm软件的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study aims We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative elastography (shear wave elastography) and to establish the optimal cutoff value to differentiate malignant and benign breast lesions using QelaXtoTM software. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult women with suspicious breast lesions (BIRADS 3, 4 or 5) who underwent programmed ultrasound-guided core biopsies. Breast lesions were assessed using quantitative elastography combined with B-mode ultrasound. Histopathology was used as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated, and a ROC curve analysis was conducted. Three elastography cutoff values were considered: 36, 50 and 80 kPa. Results We included 143 women (mean age of 56 years) with a total of 145 breast lesions: 68 benign tumors (47.26%) and 77 malignancies (52.74%). Mean elasticity measurements of benign and malignant lesions were significantly different (24.6 kPa, SD 28.47, vs. 101.49 kPa, SD 47.38, p < 0.0001 ). Using the 50 kPa cutoff, elastography showed a global sensitivity of 87% to discriminate malignant lesions (AUC = 0.897). Moreover, sensitivity was 90.7% when lesions were located 5–40 mm below the skin surface (optimal elastographic field of view). Our false positive rate was 17.65%, comprised mainly of fibroepithelial neoplasms, fibroadenomas and fibrosis. Conclusions Quantitative elastography can differentiate malignant and benign breast lesions with acceptable to excellent performance. In our sample, the QelaXtoTM software showed a lower optimal cutoff than other ultrasound systems.
机译:研究旨在我们寻求评估定量弹性造影(剪切波弹性造影)的诊断性能,并建立使用QElaxtotm软件来区分恶性和良性乳房病变的最佳截止值。方法对具有可疑乳腺病变(Birads 3,4或5)进行的患者进行了对患者的重新点观察研究,他接受了编程的超声引导核心活检。使用定量弹性成像与B模式超声结合进行乳房病变。组织病理学用作参考标准。估计敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和负预测值(NPV),并进行ROC曲线分析。考虑了三个弹性摄影值:36,50和80 KPA。结果我们包括143名女性(平均年龄为56岁),共145例乳腺病变:68例良性肿瘤(47.26%)和77名恶性肿瘤(52.74%)。良性和恶性病变的平均弹性测量显着差异(24.6kPa,SD 28.47,Vs.101.49 KPA,SD 47.38,P <0.0001)。使用50 kPa截止值,弹性显影显示出87%的全局敏感性,以区分恶性病变(AUC = 0.897)。此外,当病变位于皮肤表面下方5-40毫米时,敏感性为90.7%(最佳弹性素视野)。我们的假阳性率为17.65%,主要包括纤维上皮肿瘤,纤维腺瘤和纤维化。结论定量弹性显影可以鉴别恶性和良性乳腺病变,可接受的优异性能。在我们的示例中,Qelaxtotm软件显示出比其他超声系统的最佳截止值较低。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Ultrasound》 |2020年第4期|575-583|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Breast Imaging and Interventional Radiology Department Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina;

    Department of Health Informatics Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina;

    Breast Imaging and Interventional Radiology Department Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina;

    Breast Imaging and Interventional Radiology Department Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina;

    Breast Imaging and Interventional Radiology Department Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina;

    Research Department Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Elastography; Breast cancer; Mammary ultrasonography; Elasticity imaging techniques;

    机译:弹性成像;乳腺癌;乳房超声;弹性成像技术;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号