首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sustainable Tourism >Policy Relevance and Sustainable Tourism Research: Liberal, Radical and Post-structuralist Perspectives
【24h】

Policy Relevance and Sustainable Tourism Research: Liberal, Radical and Post-structuralist Perspectives

机译:政策相关性和可持续旅游业研究:自由主义,激进主义和后结构主义观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Much of the academic research on tourism and sustainability is concerned with identifying socio-economic, cultural and environmental problems and suggesting short-term ameliorating measures or more substantial longer-term policies. This work is often premised on the notion that the researcher might have some influence on the creation of policy, perhaps even on the monitoring and evaluation of policy. But there has been little debate in the sustainable tourism literature on how academics' views and their approaches to research affect their policy recommendations, on what sorts of involvement researchers should have in policy arenas and debates, and on quite how radical the policy recommendations of academics ought to be. Such debates have occurred in human geography, for example, and the critical dialogue that has taken place in that field (Johnston, 1997) has a direct bearing on the work of researchers concerned with sustainable tourism, especially given tourism's impacts on societal well-being and the global environment. Questions need to be asked about whom we are producing knowledge for and about how we should be trying to influence policies (Hall, 2005a; Ruhanen & Cooper, 2004).
机译:关于旅游业和可持续性的许多学术研究都涉及确定社会经济,文化和环境问题,并提出短期改善措施或更实质性的长期政策。这项工作通常以这样的观念为前提:研究人员可能会对政策的制定产生影响,甚至可能对政策的监控和评估产生影响。但是,在可持续旅游业文献中,关于学者的观点及其研究方法如何影响他们的政策建议,研究人员应该在政策领域和辩论中采取何种参与以及关于学者的政策建议有多么激进的争论很少。必定是。例如,这种辩论发生在人文地理上,在该领域进行的批判性对话(Johnston,1997年)直接关系到关注可持续旅游业的研究人员的工作,特别是考虑到旅游业对社会福祉的影响和全球环境。需要问一些问题,即我们为谁提供知识,以及我们应该如何影响政策(Hall,2005a; Ruhanen&Cooper,2004)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号