...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of structural engineering >Reliability-Based Code Calibration for Design of Wood Members Using Load and Resistance Factor Design
【24h】

Reliability-Based Code Calibration for Design of Wood Members Using Load and Resistance Factor Design

机译:基于载荷和阻力系数设计的木构件设计基于可靠性的代码校准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The procedures underlying the load and resistance factor design (LRFD) format for engineered wood construction combine elements of reliability analysis with the experience gained from decades of successful use of allowable stress design procedures. However, the judgments applied in much of the early development or LRFD hinged directly on the load factors and underlying load distribution assumptions in the 1993 version of the ASCE 7 load standard. Since that time, load factors in ASCE 7 have changed several times and additional information is available regarding load distributions. Assumptions regarding resistance statistics also have evolved during the past decade. For example, early reliability analyses were based on resistance distributions derived from individual data sets. Unfortunately, this approach is confounded by often significant differences that occur between data sets. This approach also neglects the self-calibrating nature of engineered wood product specifications. This paper examines the range of computed reliability indices that result from updating the assumed load statistics and assumed resistance statistics. Several load cases involving dead, live, snow, and wind load are examined. The reference structural configuration is a simple flexural member. The results show that the range of computed reliability indices is most significantly influenced by regional variations in load statistics. While these results also show slight differences in computed reliability indices from one engineered wood product to another, these differences are not judged to be significant. The results of this study will not only assist the Structural Engineering Institute Design of Engineered Wood Construction Standards Committee in their upcoming revision of ASCE 16, but can also serve as a template for other material standards committees (steel, concrete) as they update their LRFD specifications to reflect evolutionary changes in ASCE 7.
机译:工程木结构的载荷和阻力因子设计(LRFD)格式的基础程序将可靠性分析的要素与数十年来成功使用允许应力设计程序所获得的经验相结合。但是,在早期开发或LRFD中的许多判断都直接取决于1993年版ASCE 7负荷标准中的负荷因子和潜在负荷分布假设。从那时起,ASCE 7中的负载系数已更改了数次,并且可以获得有关负载分布的其他信息。在过去的十年中,有关耐药性统计的假设也有所发展。例如,早期的可靠性分析是基于从各个数据集得出的电阻分布。不幸的是,这种方法被数据集之间经常存在的显着差异所混淆。这种方法还忽略了工程木产品规格的自校准性质。本文研究了通过更新假设的负荷统计数据和假设的电阻统计数据得出的计算的可靠性指标的范围。研究了涉及静载,活载,积雪和风荷载的几种荷载工况。参考结构构造是简单的抗弯构件。结果表明,计算负荷可靠性指标的范围受负荷统计数据区域差异的影响最大。尽管这些结果还表明,从一种工程木材产品到另一种工程木材产品,在计算的可靠性指标上存在细微差异,但这些差异并不被认为是重要的。这项研究的结果不仅将帮助结构工程学院的工程木结构建筑标准委员会设计其即将修订的ASCE 16,而且还可以作为其他材料标准委员会(钢,混凝土)更新LRFD的模板反映ASCE 7演进变化的规范。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号