...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness >Validation of the NFL-225 test for predicting 1-RM bench press performance in college football players
【24h】

Validation of the NFL-225 test for predicting 1-RM bench press performance in college football players

机译:NFL-225测试用于预测大学足球运动员1-RM卧推性能的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of repetitions-to-fatigue (RTF) using an absolute load of 102.3 kg (225 lbs) to estimate one-repetition maximum (1-RM) bench press performance in college football players using various prediction equations. Methods. Experimental design: a prospective study on the association between muscular endurance and muscular strength. Participants: 260 players from NCAA Division IA (n=43), IAA (n=63), Ⅱ (n=129), and red-shirts (n=25) were evaluated at the conclusion of a minimum of eight weeks of heavy-resistance training during the off-season. Measures: all subjects performed a 1-RM bench press and RTF using an absolute load of 102.3 kg. Results. The Mayhew et al. NFL-225 equation nonsignificantly overestimated 1-RM from RTF by 0.5 kg, while the Chapman et al. NFL-225 equation significantly underpredicted by 3.2 kg, although both equations were comparable in the number of players predicted within +-4.5 kg of actual 1-RM (52% vs 51%, respectively). Only two of nine RTF equations currently in use produced predicted 1-RM values that were not significantly different from actual 1-RM performance. Conclusions. Specific NFL-225 equations are more accurate in estimating 1-RM bench press from absolute muscle endurance in college football players than previous published RTF equations. The accuracy of prediction decreases at higher repetitions.
机译:背景。这项研究的目的是使用102.3 kg(225 lbs)的绝对载荷来评估重复疲劳的精确度(RTF),以评估使用各种运动量的大学生足球运动员的一次重复最大值(1-RM)卧推性能。预测方程式。方法。实验设计:前瞻性研究肌肉耐力和肌肉力量之间的关系。参与者:至少经过8周的沉重训练,评估了260名来自NCAA IA组(n = 43),IAA(n = 63),Ⅱ(n = 129)和红衫军(n = 25)的球员在淡季进行抗阻力训练。措施:所有受试者均使用102.3 kg的绝对负荷进行1-RM卧推和RTF。结果。 Mayhew等。 NFL-225方程无明显高估了RTF的1-RM 0.5 kg,而Chapman等人。 NFL-225方程被低估了3.2公斤,尽管这两个方程在实际1-RM的+ -4.5公斤以内预测的球员数量具有可比性(分别为52%和51%)。当前使用的9个RTF方程中只有2个产生的1-RM预测值与实际的1-RM性能没有显着差异。结论。从以前的RTF方程式来看,特定的NFL-225方程式在从绝对的足球耐力中估计1-RM卧推时更准确。预测的准确性随着重复次数的增加而降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号