首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the society of archivists >Neither physical nor juridical persons: electronic personhood and an evolving theory of archival diplomatics
【24h】

Neither physical nor juridical persons: electronic personhood and an evolving theory of archival diplomatics

机译:既不是人物也不是司法人士:电子人物和档案外交学的不断发展的理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2017 the European Union (EU) adopted P8_TA-PRO0051, a resolution outlining a series of recommendations for the Commission on Civil Law Rules for Robotics. Despite its ostensibly futuristic premise, the resolution is firmly grounded in the concerns of the present: mapping the legal and ethical implications of autonomous robots for European lawmakers. Included in the EU resolution is the proposal to investigate creating a legal status for electronic persons so that autonomous robots can be responsible for damages they cause. One inconspicuous site that stands to be transformed by a legislative instrument granting electronic personhood is archival diplomatics: the prospect of electronic persons represents a peculiar challenge to some of its foundational ideas. That is, the definition of persons - the central element of any document - within diplomatics has not yet been discussed in relation to the possibility of electronic persons or personhood. Drawing from legal scholarship on robotics, I will provide an exploratory overview of what a status as persons for autonomous robots and AI systems might entail for an evolving theory of archival diplomatics.
机译:2017年,欧洲联盟(欧盟)通过了P8_TA-PRO0051,该决议概述了机器人法规规则委员会的一系列建议。尽管处于明显的未来前提,但该决议牢固地基于本发明的担忧:绘制自治机器人对欧洲立法者的法律和伦理影响。欧盟决议中包含的是调查电子人士的法律地位的建议,以便自治机器人负责他们导致的损害赔偿。由授予电子人物的立法文书的一个不明显的网站是归档外交学:电子人士的前景对其一些基本思想来说是一个特殊的挑战。也就是说,人们的定义 - 任何文件的中央要素 - 外交组织尚未与电子人士或个人的可能性讨论。从机器人学上绘制法律奖学金,我将提供探索性概述自治机器人和AI系统的人类可能需要归于档案外交学的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号