首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community >‘Call it personalisation if you like’: the realities and dilemmas of organising care in a small rural community
【24h】

‘Call it personalisation if you like’: the realities and dilemmas of organising care in a small rural community

机译:“如果您愿意,就称其为个性化”:在一个小型农村社区中组织护理的现实和困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using the threatened closure of a 15-place local authority care home and the policy of ‘personalisation’ of care as a starting point, Beechfield Community Care (BCC) is aiming to set up a comprehensive care organisation serving a small town and the scattered rural parishes surrounding it. This paper questions the convoluted thinking behind the ‘personalisation agenda’; discusses the difficulties of reconciling the national and local government version of personalisation with a community's ideas and expectations of genuinely personal care; and relates and analyses the struggle to establish a truly independent, community-owned and -run ‘personal care’ organisation. Beechfield Community Care has to utilise and exploit government (national and local) policy and initiatives, including ‘personalisation’, as the main channels to the resources needed to set up the organisation and run it. The organisation and management — the ‘bureaucratisation’ — of social care is always somewhat at odds with the truly personal and communal, human motivations and instincts of caring for one another individually and collectively. Effective care organisations find ways to engage the caring energy and spirit of human beings and their communities, to support and develop them, and to coordinate them, and this is the challenge that faces Beechfield Community Care.View full textDownload full textKeywordspersonalisation, community action, bureaucracy, social care, rural community, defences against anxietyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2010.500126
机译:Beechfield Community Care(BCC)计划以封闭的15个地方政府护理院的关闭和“个人化”护理政策为出发点,旨在建立一个服务于小镇和城镇的综合护理组织。周围分散的乡村。本文对“个性化议程”背后令人费解的思想提出了质疑。讨论将国家和地方政府版本的个性化与社区对真正的个人护理的想法和期望相协调的困难;并分析并分析了建立真正独立,社区拥有和运行的“个人护理”组织的努力。 Beechfield Community Care必须利用和利用政府(国家和地方)的政策和计划,包括“个性化”,作为建立和运营组织所需资源的主要渠道。社会关怀的组织和管理(“官僚化”)总是与真正的个人和社区,人为动机和个人和集体照料的本能相矛盾。有效的护理组织找到方法,以激发人们及其社区的关怀能量和精神,支持和发展它们,并进行协调,这是Beechfield社区护理面临的挑战。查看全文下载全文关键字个性化,社区行动,官僚机构,社会关怀,农村社区,抗焦虑措施相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”, pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2010.500126

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号