首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Service Research >Pricing Metrics and the Importance of Minimum and Billing Increments
【24h】

Pricing Metrics and the Importance of Minimum and Billing Increments

机译:定价度量和最低计费增量的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Service providers often use minimum increments and billing increments to charge for higher usage than customers' true usage. Despite their popularity in business practice, research has largely ignored these increments and assumed that charged usage always equals true usage. We develop an overcharging index that represents the extent to which a customer is charged for units that she or he did not use and identify situations in which the overcharging index is particularly high. In three empirical studies in the highly competitive telecommunication market, we demonstrate that providers are increasingly using longer minimum and billing increments. These increments yield an average overcharge of true usage of 43.79% for customers with long increments. These increments generate additional revenues that are responsible for almost two thirds (66.2%) of the operating profits of the main providers in Germany and the United States. Customers, particularly those who are less educated, seem to not understand minimum and billing increments well, do not adjust their behavior to different increments, and often make tariff choice errors unsystematically.
机译:服务提供商通常使用最小增量和计费增量来收取比客户的真实用法更高的使用费用。尽管他们对商业惯例的普及,但研究在很大程度上忽略了这些增量,并假设收费的使用始终等于真实用法。我们开发了一个过度收费的指数,代表了客户被收取的单位为她或他没有使用的单位,并识别过充电指数特别高的情况。在竞争激烈的电信市场中的三项实证研究中,我们证明提供商越来越多地使用更长的最低和计费增量。这些增量的平均用量为43.79%,对于长期增量。这些增量会产生额外的收入,该收入负责德国和美国主要提供商的营业利润的近三分之二(66.2%)。客户,特别是那些受过培养的人,似乎不太了解最低和计费增量,不要将其行为调整到不同的增量,并且通常不系统地进行关税选择错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号