首页> 外文期刊>Journal of risk research >Standards for risk assessment of standards: how the international community is starting to address the risk of the wrong standards
【24h】

Standards for risk assessment of standards: how the international community is starting to address the risk of the wrong standards

机译:标准的风险评估标准:国际社会如何开始应对错误标准的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Technical standards pervade commerce and society and allow the complexity of modern life to operate at all levels, global included. They also provide protection against many risks, whether from food, from dangerous products or from fraud. They are so self-evidently worthy that they are rarely challenged, yet anything as powerful and pervasive as the web of standards needs some element of oversight and quality assurance. There is a danger of over-regulating and the placing of unnecessary constraints on the market and, cumulatively, a constraint on liberties. Technical standards are derived from many sources and for many reasons. The oversight function may need to relate to these reasons, such as the World Trade Organisation controls on damage to trade through protectionist standards. A very common reason for standards is safety, which tends to be treated as an absolute, as an objective technical matter, and there is less oversight or quality assurance of standards set for safety reasons. But safety is a relative term and increases in safety will usually have costs. Judgement needs to be applied in a risk assessment but that raises institutional issues as to who is qualified to apply that judgement. There are also issues of the accountability of those who increase the safety ratchet, which are also related to the institutional issue. This paper explores a case study of one draft standard as an illustration of the need for oversight and then goes on to consider methods of managing the risks inherent in standardisation and technical regulation. It looks in particular at two recent initiatives from within the standards community itself. One is a broad-based proposal for the community to focus on risk management and the other is an instance where a technical regulator has commissioned and designed an impact assessment system in order to provide that quality assurance and accountability.
机译:技术标准遍及商业和社会,并允许现代生活的复杂性在包括全球在内的所有层面上运作。它们还提供了针对多种风险的保护,无论是食品,危险产品还是欺诈。它们是如此不言而喻,以至于很少受到挑战,但是像标准网这样强大而普遍的事物都需要进行监督和质量保证。存在过度监管的危险,对市场施加不必要的限制,并且有累积地限制自由的危险。技术标准有很多来源,并且有很多原因。监督职能可能需要与这些原因相关,例如世界贸易组织通过贸易保护主义标准控制贸易损害的措施。标准的一个非常普遍的原因是安全,它通常被视为绝对的客观技术问题,并且出于安全原因对标准制定的监督或质量保证也较少。但是安全是一个相对的术语,安全性的提高通常会带来成本。判断需要在风险评估中进行,但这会引起有关谁有资格执行该判断的机构性问题。还有一些增加安全棘手责任的人的责任,这也与体制问题有关。本文探索了一个标准草案的案例研究,以说明需要进行监督,然后继续考虑管理标准化和技术法规中固有风险的方法。它特别关注标准界自身内部的两项最新举措。一种是针对社区的,针对风险管理的基础广泛的建议,另一种是技术监管机构委托并设计了影响评估系统以提供质量保证和责任制的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号