首页> 外文期刊>Journal of retailing and consumer services >The impact of payment method on shopping behaviour among low income consumers
【24h】

The impact of payment method on shopping behaviour among low income consumers

机译:付款方式对低收入消费者购物行为的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: It is well known that certain payment methods, such as credit and debit cards, can increase consumer spending. For many low income consumers, who cannot typically increase their spend, the relationship between payment method and spending has not been empirically examined. Using grocery store sales data, this research takes advantage of the introduction of a geographically-targeted Cashless Debit Card for welfare recipients in Australia to investigate the impact of payment methods on spending behaviour.Design/methodology/approach: Recipients of government welfare and support payments were automatically enrolled into the Cashless Debit Card program, with 80% of their support payments deposited onto the card. The card prevented the withdrawal of cash money. The sales data from the local grocery store from the region where this program was implemented were obtained, as well as the data from two grocery stores from a control community in a similar region where the program was not implemented. The change in price elasticities of demand was then assessed.Findings: The overall grocery market became more inelastic as a consequence of the introduction of the Cashless Debit Card, while total spend in-store remained stable.Research limitations/implications: Prior research has shown that consumers spend more when using card versus cash payments. We extend that research to show that low income consumers do not spend more, but do become less responsive to price cues when grocery shopping with a card. The advantage of our research was the ability to identify a 'moment' when there was a switch from cash to card payments due to the introduction of the Cashless Debit Card program, and compare it with a similar location that was not subject to the program. However, limiting the research to only recipients of support payments may increase the effect size, and the true size of the change may be unique to different research contexts.Practical implications: The findings highlight to businesses that their current sales and promotions strategies may be less effective following the adoption of card payments by consumers. Campaigns will need to be more prominent or discounts deeper to produce the same uplift in sales as previously experienced. Policymakers encouraging the use of card payments will also need to accommodate this change in consumer behaviour, which may slightly reduce the amount of product consumers obtain for their dollar.Originality/value: The impact of payment method on typical consumers has been considered; however, this research focuses on low income consumers whose more limited resources make them more vulnerable to changes in market conditions.
机译:目的:众所周知,某些付款方式(例如信用卡和借记卡)可以增加消费者的支出。对于许多通常无法增加支出的低收入消费者,还没有从经验上检验支付方式与支出之间的关系。通过使用杂货店销售数据,这项研究利用为澳大利亚的福利接收者引入了针对地理位置的无现金借记卡,以研究支付方式对支出行为的影响。设计/方法/方法:政府福利和支持性支付的接受者会自动注册到无现金借记卡计划中,并将其支持付款的80%存入卡中。该卡阻止提取现金。获得了实施该程序的地区的本地杂货店的销售数据,以及未实施该程序的类似地区的控制社区的两家杂货店的数据。然后评估了需求的价格弹性变化。发现:由于引入了无现金借记卡,整个杂货市场变得更加缺乏弹性,而店内总支出保持稳定。研究局限/含意:先前的研究表明消费者在使用卡支付时比在现金支付时花费更多。我们扩展了该研究范围,以显示低收入消费者不会花更多钱,但是在使用卡进行杂货店购物时,他们对价格线索的反应变慢了。我们研究的优势是能够识别由于引入无现金借记卡计划而从现金转为卡支付时的“时刻”,并将其与不受该计划约束的类似地点进行比较。但是,仅将研究限于补助金的接受者可能会增加影响的大小,并且更改的真实大小可能因不同的研究环境而异。实际意义:研究结果向企业强调,他们当前的销售和促销策略可能较少在消费者采用卡付款后生效。广告活动将需要更加突出或折扣幅度更大,才能产生与以前相同的销售额增长。鼓励使用卡支付的政策制定者还需要适应消费者行为的这种变化,这可能会稍微减少消费者以美元购买的产品数量。来源/价值:已经考虑了支付方式对典型消费者的影响;但是,这项研究的重点是低收入消费者,他们的资源更加有限,使他们更容易受到市场条件变化的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号