首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research in science teaching >A Comparison of Students' Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits in Simulation Only and Simulation-Laboratory Contexts
【24h】

A Comparison of Students' Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits in Simulation Only and Simulation-Laboratory Contexts

机译:仅模拟和模拟实验室环境下学生对电路的概念理解的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this experimental study was to compare learning outcomes of students using a simulation alone (simulation environment) with outcomes of those using a simulation in parallel with real circuits (combination environment) in the domain of electricity, and to explore how learning outcomes in these environments are mediated by implicit (only procedural guidance) and explicit (more structure and guidance for the discovery process) instruction. Matched-quartets were created based on the pre-test results of 50 elementary school students and divided randomly into a simulation implicit (SI), simulation explicit (SE), combination implicit (CI) and combination explicit (CE) conditions. The results demonstrated that the instructional support had an expected effect on students' understanding of electric circuits when they used the simulation alone; pure procedural guidance (SI) was insufficient to promote conceptual understanding, but when the students were given more guidance for the discovery process (SE) they were able to gain significant amount of subject knowledge. A surprising finding was that when the students used the simulation and the real circuits in parallel, the explicit instruction (CE) did not seem to elicit much additional gain for their understanding of electric circuits compared to the implicit instruction (CI). Instead, the explicit instruction slowed down the inquiry process substantially in the combination environment (CE). Although the explicit instruction was able to improve students' conceptual understanding of electrical circuits considerably in the simulation environment, their understanding did not reach the level of the students in the combination environment. These results suggest that when teaching students about electricity, the students can gain better understanding when they have an opportunity to use the simulation and the real circuits in parallel than if they have only a computer simulation available, even when the use of the simulation is supported with the explicit instruction.
机译:这项实验研究的目的是比较单独使用模拟(模拟环境)的学生的学习成果与在电学领域与真实电路(组合环境)并联使用模拟的学生的成果,并探讨如何在模拟领域学习成果。这些环境由隐式(仅用于过程指导)和显式(用于发现过程的更多结构和指导)指令介导。匹配四重奏是根据50名小学生的测试前结果创建的,并随机分为模拟隐式(SI),模拟显式(SE),组合隐式(CI)和组合显式(CE)条件。结果表明,单独使用模拟时,教学支持会对学生对电路的理解产生预期的影响。单纯的程序指导(SI)不足以促进概念理解,但是当为学生提供更多关于发现过程(SE)的指导时,他们可以获得大量的主题知识。令人惊讶的发现是,当学生并行使用仿真和真实电路时,与隐式指令(CI)相比,显式指令(CE)似乎并未为他们对电路的理解带来很多额外的收获。相反,显式指令在组合环境(CE)中大大减慢了查询过程。尽管明确的指导能够在模拟环境中极大地提高学生对电路的概念理解,但他们的理解并没有达到组合环境中学生的水平。这些结果表明,在教给学生有关电的知识时,即使只有支持计算机仿真的情况,与只有计算机仿真的情况下相比,他们有机会并行使用仿真和真实电路时,他们也可以更好地理解。与明确的指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号