首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Religion and Health >Who Pays for Providing Spiritual Care in Healthcare Settings? The Ethical Dilemma of Taxpayers Funding Holistic Healthcare and the First Amendment Requirement for Separation of Church and State
【24h】

Who Pays for Providing Spiritual Care in Healthcare Settings? The Ethical Dilemma of Taxpayers Funding Holistic Healthcare and the First Amendment Requirement for Separation of Church and State

机译:谁为在医疗保健场所提供精神护理付费?纳税人为整体医疗提供资金的道德困境和政教分离的第一修正案要求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

All US governmental, public, and private healthcare facilities and their staff fall under some form of regulatory requirement to provide opportunities for spiritual health assessment and care as a component of holistic healthcare. As often the case with regulations, these facilities face the predicament of funding un-reimbursable care. However, chaplains and nurses who provide most patient spiritual care are paid using funds the facility obtains from patients, private, and public sources. Furthermore, Veteran healthcare services, under the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), are provided with taxpayer funds from local, state, and federal governments. With the recent legal action by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. (FFRF) against the Veterans Administration, the ethical dilemma surfaces between taxpayers funding holistic healthcare and the first amendment requirement for separation of church and state.
机译:美国所有政府,公共和私人医疗保健机构及其员工均受某种形式的法规要求,以提供精神健康评估和护理的机会,作为整体医疗保健的一部分。与法规经常发生的情况一样,这些设施面临着为无偿医疗提供资金的困境。但是,提供最多患者精神护理的牧师和护士将使用该机构从患者,私人和公共渠道获得的资金来支付费用。此外,美国退伍军人事务部(VA)旗下的退伍军人医疗服务由地方,州和联邦政府提供纳税人资金。随着宗教自由基金会(FFRF)最近针对退伍军人管理局的法律诉讼,在为整体医疗保健提供资金的纳税人与对教会与国家分离的第一个修正要求之间出现了道德困境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号